This is the World Famous TelemarkTalk / TelemarkTips / Telemark Francais Forum, by far the most dynamic telemark and backcountry skiing discussion board on the world wide web since 1998. East, West, North, South, Canada, US or Europe, Backcountry or not.
This is the World Famous TelemarkTalk / TelemarkTips / Telemark Francais Forum, by far the most dynamic telemark and backcountry skiing discussion board on the world wide web since 1998. East, West, North, South, Canada, US or Europe, Backcountry or not.
This is the World Famous TelemarkTalk / TelemarkTips Forum, by far the most dynamic telemark and backcountry skiing discussion board on the world wide web. We have fun here, come on in and be a part of it.
Curious to hear more feedback about the Transnordic 75’s. Which binding seems best with them? Is a Switcback X2 too much binding for them? Would they be okay for the rare day at a ski hill for casual skiing?
Only used them with pureplay 3pins thus far, both xc and in the resort (with Gamme(!)).
They're ideal for real downhill if you're looking for the oldschool tele feels.
I would recommend a free pivot with them. They have a solid beam on the sides, which makes the toe box bend awkwardly and somewhat painfully with 3-pins.
They also have a very downhill-oriented forward leaning geometry that you recognise from plastic shoes, so not ideal for xc touring that 3-pins would otherwise facilitate for.
Personally going for SB. Will keep you posted.
Wouldn't be surprised to see them work with x2 as well. Would like to hear if anyone has tried this.
(They're definitely capable to drive significantly fatter skis. This was just for fun..)
Thanks for the response TheMusher. I tried my plastic boots yesterday but with the foot growth I experienced they’re super-uncomfortable now. I’m maxed out on the shell size so looking at investing in a pair of boots for occasional downhill play. I’ve realized I’m shying away from plastic, leather just feels way too good. The Fischer Transnordic 75 seems to meet my needs. Lundhags Guide Expedition 75 is another one I’m interested in but it’s quite an investment.
Thanks for the response TheMusher. I tried my plastic boots yesterday but with the foot growth I experienced they’re super-uncomfortable now. I’m maxed out on the shell size so looking at investing in a pair of boots for occasional downhill play. I’ve realized I’m shying away from plastic, leather just feels way too good. The Fischer Transnordic 75 seems to meet my needs. Lundhags Guide Expedition 75 is another one I’m interested in but it’s quite an investment.
Keep in mind both the Lundhags 75mm boots apparently require a wire or cable. They don't want you using just a 3 pin.
Thanks for the response TheMusher. I tried my plastic boots yesterday but with the foot growth I experienced they’re super-uncomfortable now. I’m maxed out on the shell size so looking at investing in a pair of boots for occasional downhill play. I’ve realized I’m shying away from plastic, leather just feels way too good. The Fischer Transnordic 75 seems to meet my needs. Lundhags Guide Expedition 75 is another one I’m interested in but it’s quite an investment.
Happy to help!
Are you intending to use them solely for occasional downhill skiing, or also for some xc touring? I've seen their strengths and weaknesses upclose, so would be happy to share my considerations based on of your intended use.
In general terms, I'd say go for...
.. Lundhags if you are looking for xc touring with occasional downhill skiing (moderately steep terrain).
.. Fischer if the focus is primarily on downhill skiing (resort and steep terrain), with no major xc ambitions.
Also keep in mind what Wabene says, that the Lundhags are not recommended with 3-pins. To be fair, I'd say the same applies to the Fischer (when moving in flat terrain).
Well, IMO, the Fischers are XC capable, just not as comfy for it as certain lower boots. I did 12-15 km day tours without being particularly annoyed, in Rotte 3 pin bindings. It may help to just lace up the bottom part and leave the top loose.
Hey everyone - I hope this is okay to post. Just heads up for anyone looking at these: Backcountry.com has these on huge sale right now, over $100 off on both the 75 mm and NNN-BC versions. But they don't have many sizes left in inventory. So if you are looking to get these and they have your size in stock, it wouldn't be a bad time to do so!
I just picked up a pair of the NNN-BC from REI in size 45, and just test fitting them in my living room, I find them to be a little bit big on me compared to my Alpina Outlanders in 45, which fit me very well. I have pretty wide feet - I normally wear about a 10 E to EE, and I generally fit well into Pearl Izumi size 44 cycling shoes.
The BCX Transnordic are pretty high volume, with lots of space above my feet, even laced very tightly. They are definitely extremely stiff as reported by others, with tons of lateral and rearwards ankle support. Forward leaning stride flexibility is decent, and without having actually skied in them, I imagine they will tour okay, especially in more rugged terrain.
I also ordered a pair in size 44 from Backcountry - at that price why not, eh? So I'll compare the two. The only shop in lower Michigan I know of that would stock them (xcskishop.com in Grayling) doesn't seem to have any, so in person wasn't really an option this year.
