Short, waxable ski recommendation

This is the World Famous TelemarkTalk / TelemarkTips Forum, by far the most dynamic telemark and backcountry skiing discussion board on the world wide web. We have fun here, come on in and be a part of it.
User avatar
randoskier
Posts: 1078
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2016 2:08 am
Location: Yank in Italy
Ski style: awkward
Favorite Skis: snow skis
Favorite boots: go-go
Occupation: International Pop Sensation

Re: Short, waxable ski recommendation

Post by randoskier » Mon Nov 25, 2024 9:42 am

The man himself!
nansen.jpg

User avatar
Capercaillie
Posts: 222
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2022 1:35 pm
Location: western Canada
Ski style: trying not to fall too much
Favorite Skis: Alpina 1500T, Kazama Telemark Comp
Favorite boots: Alfa Horizon, Crispi Nordland, Scarpa T4

Re: Short, waxable ski recommendation

Post by Capercaillie » Mon Nov 25, 2024 11:48 am

If you look at what online retailers are stocking this season, it seems like Åsnes has decided to go all-in on trying to push the waxless crap. This will probably be the end of the brand. As @randoskier mentioned, their product in this market is vastly overpriced and underperforming. I don't understand who decided it would be a good idea to change almost their entire product line to an over-crowded market segment where they have no competitive advantage.

A few comments on their marketing BS:

"Waxless skis have come a long way. The position, design, functionality, and length of the patterns have all been adapted and developed for the benefit of increased efficiency and effectiveness, both in grip and glide. That is to say that the new generation of waxless skis are vastly different skis from older skis... In short, waxless bases have become a truly valid option."

If you read any books or magazine articles from the mid-1970s onwards, literally this same BS is repeated over and over again every single season.

"The combination of waxless soles and skins is extremely versatile, simple, and reliable."

The Åsnes kicker skin attachment is very reliable... at peeling the kicker skin off of the ski. IMO it is a seriously flawed design.



User avatar
corlay
Posts: 151
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2021 6:13 pm
Location: central NY
Ski style: Woodland XC-BC tours
Favorite Skis: Asnes Gamme 54, Fischer Transnordic 66, Fischer Traverse 78; Madshus Birke Beiner, Peltonen METSA
Favorite boots: Crispi Norland Hook BC, Fischer BC Grand Tour

Re: Short, waxable ski recommendation

Post by corlay » Mon Nov 25, 2024 3:59 pm

scales have their place.
and, as mentioned, Fischer's are about the best out there at the moment.

I like scales for either:
a) warm conditions (>30f) I don't like to mess with soft waxes/Klisters
-or-
b) variable conditions, anticipated large temp swings across the tour and/or varying show conditions (fluff, hard-pak, slush, ice, etc)

but nothing beats a pair of waxed bases in the right conditions.
(and when you've nailed the wax/temp choice!)
Last edited by corlay on Mon Nov 25, 2024 5:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.



User avatar
socaltim
Posts: 19
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2024 3:11 pm

Re: Short, waxable ski recommendation

Post by socaltim » Mon Nov 25, 2024 4:21 pm

The problem with waxable skis is the same skis can work well in many different conditions if the wax is right. I mean, that is a problem if you sell skis. When the skiing is not so good you think you had better wax differently next time, instead of you had better buy some different skis.



mca80
Posts: 1014
Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2022 5:24 pm
Location: Da UP eh
Ski style: Over the river and through the woods
Favorite Skis: Nansen, Finnmark, Kongsvold, Combat NATO, Fischer Superlite, RCS
Favorite boots: Crispi Bre, Hook, Alpina 1600, Alico Ski March, Crispi Mountain

Re: Short, waxable ski recommendation

Post by mca80 » Mon Nov 25, 2024 6:11 pm

Capercaillie wrote:
Mon Nov 25, 2024 11:48 am
The Åsnes kicker skin attachment is very reliable... at peeling the kicker skin off of the ski. IMO it is a seriously flawed design.
I have never had this happen. Has it been common for you? Granted, I haven't used their skins except for steep climbs and very, very rarely when not wanting to wax for grip, so my dataset is minimal. Also, their NATO ski has a recessed area for the skin attachment point which I would think makes it even less likely to disengage. The rest of your analaysis is dead-on--they occupy a niche for metal edged backcountry waxable skis, dominate this market even with their higher pricepoint, and are instead focusing on something which others (Fischer) do better.



User avatar
pacificnomad
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2024 4:06 pm
Location: Western US
Ski style: XCd
Favorite Skis: Fischer Transnordic 66 waxable, Asnes Knogsvold
Favorite boots: Alfa Gaurd
Occupation: Catlady

Re: Short, waxable ski recommendation

Post by pacificnomad » Mon Nov 25, 2024 7:40 pm

Capercaillie wrote:
Mon Nov 25, 2024 11:48 am
If you look at what online retailers are stocking this season, it seems like Åsnes has decided to go all-in on trying to push the waxless crap. This will probably be the end of the brand. As @randoskier mentioned, their product in this market is vastly overpriced and underperforming. I don't understand who decided it would be a good idea to change almost their entire product line to an over-crowded market segment where they have no competitive advantage.

A few comments on their marketing BS:

"Waxless skis have come a long way. The position, design, functionality, and length of the patterns have all been adapted and developed for the benefit of increased efficiency and effectiveness, both in grip and glide. That is to say that the new generation of waxless skis are vastly different skis from older skis... In short, waxless bases have become a truly valid option."

If you read any books or magazine articles from the mid-1970s onwards, literally this same BS is repeated over and over again every single season.

"The combination of waxless soles and skins is extremely versatile, simple, and reliable."

The Åsnes kicker skin attachment is very reliable... at peeling the kicker skin off of the ski. IMO it is a seriously flawed design.
What are your thoughts on Asnes new Nato specific skin? Looks pretty durable and like it'll stay in place better maybe. They're 100% nylon though, so more like snow shuffling rather than a nice mohair glide.



Post Reply