Physics debate

This is the World Famous TelemarkTalk / TelemarkTips Forum, by far the most dynamic telemark and backcountry skiing discussion board on the world wide web. We have fun here, come on in and be a part of it.
User avatar
DG99
Posts: 247
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2022 3:39 pm
Location: Oregon

Re: Physics debate

Post by DG99 » Fri Jan 20, 2023 2:50 am

DG99 wrote:
Thu Jan 19, 2023 10:45 pm
This particular case seems like it might not have any downward heel retention force. Since, the cable pivot point is forward of the boot bellows where it’s bending, and the front part of the boot is being held down to the ski, the bellows is very soft and the cable isn’t too tight. Not sure though, but would be easy to know if you had it on your foot!
When I put soft leather boots in a hardwire cable it crushed my foot, painfully.
Answering my own question here….

I stuck a very soft XC boot in the Switchbacks, sort of like that GIF pic system. It is very “neutral” as the boot just crushes down at the bellows, above the toes, and the pivot point on these bindings is fairly far forward. There really isn’t much downward pull from the cables until you get way over, knees towards the ski tips, then you finally run out of play in the system and lever the tips over ( I had it on that “picture frame” apparatus again).

It’s just a geometry problem, when and how much the lever comes into play. Putting the T2s into the same binding gives much more and earlier tip pressure.

User avatar
lowangle al
Posts: 2755
Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2014 3:36 pm
Location: Pocono Mts / Chugach Mts
Ski style: BC with focus on downhill perfection
Favorite Skis: powder skis
Favorite boots: Scarpa T4
Occupation: Retired cement mason. Current job is to take my recreation as serious as I did my past employment.

Re: Physics debate

Post by lowangle al » Sat Jan 21, 2023 8:46 am

I think the guy in the yellow circle demonstrates how GS thinks a cable works.
3E7B7D9A-4B44-44E2-B46A-F80E91FAC9F7.jpeg



mca80
Posts: 1014
Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2022 5:24 pm
Location: Da UP eh
Ski style: Over the river and through the woods
Favorite Skis: Nansen, Finnmark, Kongsvold, Combat NATO, Fischer Superlite, RCS
Favorite boots: Crispi Bre, Hook, Alpina 1600, Alico Ski March, Crispi Mountain

Re: Physics debate

Post by mca80 » Sat Jan 21, 2023 9:03 am

@lowangle al :lol: :lol: :lol:



User avatar
wabene
Posts: 716
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2021 9:53 am
Location: Duluth Minnesota
Ski style: Stiff kneed and wide eyed.
Favorite Skis: Åsnes Gamme, Fischer SB98, Mashus M50, M78, Pano M62
Favorite boots: Crispi Svartsen 75mm, Scarpa T4
Occupation: Carpenter

Re: Physics debate

Post by wabene » Sat Jan 21, 2023 9:19 am

:lol: :lol: the guy in the yellow circle is brilliant! :lol:



User avatar
DG99
Posts: 247
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2022 3:39 pm
Location: Oregon

Re: Physics debate

Post by DG99 » Sat Jan 21, 2023 1:42 pm

Is the yellow circle guy acting like a lever, or is he just pushing? Where’s the force vectors over the fulcrum? I don’t get it.

:lol:



User avatar
randoskier
Posts: 1080
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2016 2:08 am
Location: Yank in Italy
Ski style: awkward
Favorite Skis: snow skis
Favorite boots: go-go
Occupation: International Pop Sensation

Re: Physics debate

Post by randoskier » Mon Jan 23, 2023 5:10 pm

GrimSurfer wrote:
Mon Jan 02, 2023 7:43 am
This is a noble effort, Martin.

Regrettably, only one side of the discussion was about physics. That side laid out a position and provided a link to a book written by a ski instructor-physicist for a ski instructor association.

The counter arguments have ranged from the laws of physics don’t apply to skiing, gravity doesn’t matter in skiing, and some straw man arguments about cycling.

What’s really happening is that some people are offended by the notion that their views on how a cable binding works might have been wrong.
Only one law of physics is applicable to XCD skiing. This law was postulated by America's preeminent physicist John Lyon (aka Southside Johnny) it states- "Its's not the meat it's the motion"



User avatar
randoskier
Posts: 1080
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2016 2:08 am
Location: Yank in Italy
Ski style: awkward
Favorite Skis: snow skis
Favorite boots: go-go
Occupation: International Pop Sensation

Re: Physics debate

Post by randoskier » Mon Jan 23, 2023 5:11 pm

mca80 wrote:
Sat Jan 21, 2023 9:03 am
@lowangle al :lol: :lol: :lol:

hahahahaha good un



User avatar
TallGrass
Posts: 442
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2022 8:13 pm

Re: Physics debate

Post by TallGrass » Fri May 12, 2023 4:23 pm

For any "Tip Pressure" measured, how do you separate any from the cable, from any from the shoe/boot flex?

I would think if you took a 3-pin binding * WITH a cable and measured with and without the cable attached would be one way.

* A profile photo of the boot in the binding both at rest and flexed for each would also need to be included.



User avatar
Stephen
Posts: 1487
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2020 12:49 am
Location: PNW USA
Ski style: Aspirational
Favorite Skis: Armada Tracer 118 (195), Gamme (210), Ingstad (205), Objective BC (178)
Favorite boots: Alfa Guard Advance, Scarpa TX Pro
Occupation: Beyond
6’3” / 191cm — 172# / 78kg, size 47 / 30 mondo

Re: Physics debate

Post by Stephen » Fri May 12, 2023 6:16 pm

@TallGrass, did you just wake up from a long nap?
:lol:



Post Reply