Xplore vs. 3pin+cables
- lowangle al
- Posts: 2752
- Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2014 3:36 pm
- Location: Pocono Mts / Chugach Mts
- Ski style: BC with focus on downhill perfection
- Favorite Skis: powder skis
- Favorite boots: Scarpa T4
- Occupation: Retired cement mason. Current job is to take my recreation as serious as I did my past employment.
Re: Xplore vs. 3pin+cables
I would equate it to trimming a canoe. In an 18 or 20 foot boat moving forward or back by just a few cm has a very noticeable effect on performance.
- GrimSurfer
- Posts: 638
- Joined: Sun Dec 11, 2022 11:56 am
- Ski style: Nordic Backcountry
- Favorite Skis: Yes
- Favorite boots: Uh huh
Re: Xplore vs. 3pin+cables
Let’s get some objective measurements and see where they take us…
We dreamed of riding waves of air, water, snow, and energy for centuries. When the conditions were right, the things we needed to achieve this came into being. Every idea man has ever had up to that point about time and space were changed. And it keeps on changing whenever we dream. Bio mechanical jazz, man.
Re: Xplore vs. 3pin+cables
You can easily find the answer to your question by comparing the flexors in Tom M.'s film to a free pivot with equal heel lift. You''ll quickly realise that the entirety of that pressure is on the tip with a flexor, and none is in a free pivot.GrimSurfer wrote: ↑Wed Jan 04, 2023 9:51 amLet’s just take things one step at a time…lowangle al wrote: ↑Wed Jan 04, 2023 9:43 amThe pressure change might be small, but it makes a noticeable difference in your skiing.GrimSurfer wrote: ↑Wed Jan 04, 2023 9:10 am
Very interesting and informative video, @Tom M Shows a quantifiable difference in the pressure needed to deflect the boot against the flexor.
It would be interesting to repeat the experiment with scales under the front and back of the ski. That would quantify the difference in tip pressure. (You’d likely have to put a 10 lb weight under the centre of the ski to keep the ski from lifting, but that wouldn’t affect the “delta” in values.)
My theory is that the tip pressure change is small. This is based on the difference in what you measured in your experiment (which is significant but still quite small relative to skier weight).
My theory may be proven incorrect. (It is only a theory, after all). Or it may be correct. Either way, a second
experiment could provide some interesting info on tip pressure differences created by the flexor alone.
Thoughts?
If you want the abstract (you seem to be into that), 11 lbs corresponds to ca. 49 newtons (at 3 inch heel lift per Tom's film) which you will need to counter at the vector of the flexor's force, in other words the tip of the ski.
- GrimSurfer
- Posts: 638
- Joined: Sun Dec 11, 2022 11:56 am
- Ski style: Nordic Backcountry
- Favorite Skis: Yes
- Favorite boots: Uh huh
Re: Xplore vs. 3pin+cables
Maybe. A direct measurement / comparison would be useful.
More objective data is never a bad thing and @Tom M appears to have the gear (and natural curiosity) to do it.
More objective data is never a bad thing and @Tom M appears to have the gear (and natural curiosity) to do it.
We dreamed of riding waves of air, water, snow, and energy for centuries. When the conditions were right, the things we needed to achieve this came into being. Every idea man has ever had up to that point about time and space were changed. And it keeps on changing whenever we dream. Bio mechanical jazz, man.
Re: Xplore vs. 3pin+cables
Not really necessary though.
If you attach your boots to the ski+binding with flexor and push it forward, no weight/force whatsoever will be distributed to the tail.
If you attach your boots to the ski+binding with flexor and push it forward, no weight/force whatsoever will be distributed to the tail.
- GrimSurfer
- Posts: 638
- Joined: Sun Dec 11, 2022 11:56 am
- Ski style: Nordic Backcountry
- Favorite Skis: Yes
- Favorite boots: Uh huh
Re: Xplore vs. 3pin+cables
Yup… not necessarily. But that isn’t the same as “no”.
The delta between the different flexors is 7 lbs. The binding is set on, or very near, the balance point of the ski. Not that it matters that much because the forces (or torque) might be different. How different? I don’t KNOW. I have some thoughts but these don’t matter when the opportunity exists for a direct measurement.
(Direct and repeatable results with objective data are always better than conjecture or theory based on subjective feelings).
If Tom does this and posts his results, there is a logical second experiment (direct measurement) which can be carried out.
We dreamed of riding waves of air, water, snow, and energy for centuries. When the conditions were right, the things we needed to achieve this came into being. Every idea man has ever had up to that point about time and space were changed. And it keeps on changing whenever we dream. Bio mechanical jazz, man.
Re: Xplore vs. 3pin+cables
Because none of the pressure is in the tail, all of the weight/force consequently falls on the tip (to counter the vector of the flexor). The difference is 7 lbs per yourself.
I’m just saying Tom M. already did what your asking, in essence.
I’m just saying Tom M. already did what your asking, in essence.
- GrimSurfer
- Posts: 638
- Joined: Sun Dec 11, 2022 11:56 am
- Ski style: Nordic Backcountry
- Favorite Skis: Yes
- Favorite boots: Uh huh
Re: Xplore vs. 3pin+cables
He didn’t directly measure pressure at the tips. That objective measurement is a single piece of the puzzle. One of two needed to complete the experiment.
We dreamed of riding waves of air, water, snow, and energy for centuries. When the conditions were right, the things we needed to achieve this came into being. Every idea man has ever had up to that point about time and space were changed. And it keeps on changing whenever we dream. Bio mechanical jazz, man.
Re: Xplore vs. 3pin+cables
Why don’t you show us? Bending the flexor using the tail of the ski would be quite the party trick
- GrimSurfer
- Posts: 638
- Joined: Sun Dec 11, 2022 11:56 am
- Ski style: Nordic Backcountry
- Favorite Skis: Yes
- Favorite boots: Uh huh
Re: Xplore vs. 3pin+cables
I don’t own an Xplore binding.
This isn’t about the tail. It’s about tip pressure. It helps to “scale” the tail in the experiment to keep things level. Plus, it provides additional data at no expense in time. It might come in useful for the second experiment.
I’m asking for that to be measured. Is that so bad? Is the data from this experiment something to be feared?
I don’t know what the resistance is all about (pun intended).
This isn’t about the tail. It’s about tip pressure. It helps to “scale” the tail in the experiment to keep things level. Plus, it provides additional data at no expense in time. It might come in useful for the second experiment.
I’m asking for that to be measured. Is that so bad? Is the data from this experiment something to be feared?
I don’t know what the resistance is all about (pun intended).
Last edited by GrimSurfer on Wed Jan 04, 2023 11:10 am, edited 1 time in total.
We dreamed of riding waves of air, water, snow, and energy for centuries. When the conditions were right, the things we needed to achieve this came into being. Every idea man has ever had up to that point about time and space were changed. And it keeps on changing whenever we dream. Bio mechanical jazz, man.