Physics debate

[Verskis]

And we are still not discussing if the cable spring generates forward momentum, of course it does not do that. But it generates force to the ski, a force that is trying to bury the ski tip in the snow.

[GrimSurfer]

Newton's 3rd law states that for every force there is an equal but opposite counterforce. That one you've got right. But now you have to learn to apply that law.
Spring is not violating the 3rd law, it is pullin the boot heel and the binding with equal but opposite forces. These forces generate torque to the boot, and the binding. Boot torque generates force to the shin of the skier (think tall plastic boots, so it is easier to mentally get the image), the skier leg is pushing against the boot with an equal but opposite force, 3rd law not violated here. The binding torque tries to rip the rearmost binding screws out of the ski, but let's assume the screws can handle that, so the ski core holds the screws with an equal but opposite force. Once again, no laws of Newton were violated.
Since the binding is screwed rigidly to the ski, the torque generated to the binding is torqueing the ski too, trying to sink the front part of the ski deeper in the snow. So ski is pushing against the snow with some force. This force of course has the counterforce, the snow is supporting the ski with an equal but opposite force. Newton can rest in his grave, we are still abiding his 3rd law when skiing.

The forces are equal and opposite. There is no net torque. The forces cancel at the boot/binding. Nothing is transmitted to the ski other than the skier’s mass.

If this were otherwise the case, you’d have a system capable of perpetual motion.

[Verskis]

And here comes the same statement repeated 100 times

Yes, as the same statement still holds true. Tip pressure is generated, Newton's laws are not violated.

[Verskis]

Newton's 3rd law states that for every force there is an equal but opposite counterforce. That one you've got right. But now you have to learn to apply that law.
Spring is not violating the 3rd law, it is pullin the boot heel and the binding with equal but opposite forces. These forces generate torque to the boot, and the binding. Boot torque generates force to the shin of the skier (think tall plastic boots, so it is easier to mentally get the image), the skier leg is pushing against the boot with an equal but opposite force, 3rd law not violated here. The binding torque tries to rip the rearmost binding screws out of the ski, but let's assume the screws can handle that, so the ski core holds the screws with an equal but opposite force. Once again, no laws of Newton were violated.
Since the binding is screwed rigidly to the ski, the torque generated to the binding is torqueing the ski too, trying to sink the front part of the ski deeper in the snow. So ski is pushing against the snow with some force. This force of course has the counterforce, the snow is supporting the ski with an equal but opposite force. Newton can rest in his grave, we are still abiding his 3rd law when skiing.

The forces are equal and opposite. There is no net torque. The forces cancel at the boot/binding. Nothing is transmitted to the ski other than the skier’s mass.

This pig is now getting tired of the wrestling...
Make a free body diagram of the system and think about it some more.

[GrimSurfer]

And here comes the same statement repeated 100 times

Yes, as the same statement still holds true. Tip pressure is generated, Newton's laws are not violated.

Where does the pressure come from?

If the forces on the cable are equal and opposite, there is no torque (thrust and direction). There is only tension.

Your car’s springs are currently in tension. Look out the window. Do you see it jumping up on its own? Of course not. The mass and the resisting force are equal. The springs are in tension.

[wabene]

And here comes the same statement repeated 100 times

Yes, as the same statement still holds true. Tip pressure is generated, Newton's laws are not violated.

Hey @Verskis I meant this statement which I don't agree with.

"The forces are equal and opposite. There is no net torque. The forces cancel at the boot/binding. Nothing is transmitted to the ski other than the skier’s mass."

I agree with your statement which you will see if you read my previous post. I did attempt to delete the post you quoted because I've had enough. You locked me in though

[GrimSurfer]

Newton's 3rd law states that for every force there is an equal but opposite counterforce. That one you've got right. But now you have to learn to apply that law.
Spring is not violating the 3rd law, it is pullin the boot heel and the binding with equal but opposite forces. These forces generate torque to the boot, and the binding. Boot torque generates force to the shin of the skier (think tall plastic boots, so it is easier to mentally get the image), the skier leg is pushing against the boot with an equal but opposite force, 3rd law not violated here. The binding torque tries to rip the rearmost binding screws out of the ski, but let's assume the screws can handle that, so the ski core holds the screws with an equal but opposite force. Once again, no laws of Newton were violated.
Since the binding is screwed rigidly to the ski, the torque generated to the binding is torqueing the ski too, trying to sink the front part of the ski deeper in the snow. So ski is pushing against the snow with some force. This force of course has the counterforce, the snow is supporting the ski with an equal but opposite force. Newton can rest in his grave, we are still abiding his 3rd law when skiing.

The forces are equal and opposite. There is no net torque. The forces cancel at the boot/binding. Nothing is transmitted to the ski other than the skier’s mass.

This pig is now getting tired of the wrestling...
Make a free body diagram of the system and think about it some more.

I have provided quite enough explanation already. I suggest you speak to somebody with a background in physics to explain all this to you. Perhaps they will be able to do so in a way you can more easily understand.

If they manage to get through, feel free to tell your friends.

[Verskis]

And here comes the same statement repeated 100 times

Yes, as the same statement still holds true. Tip pressure is generated, Newton's laws are not violated.

Hey @Verskis I meant this statement which I don't agree with.

"The forces are equal and opposite. There is no net torque. The forces cancel at the boot/binding. Nothing is transmitted to the ski other than the skier’s mass."

I agree with your statement which you will see if you read my previous post. I did attempt to delete the post you quoted because I've had enough. You locked me in though

Alright

[Verskis]

I have provided quite enough explanation already. I suggest you speak to somebody with a background in physics to explain all this to you. Perhaps they will be able to do so in a way you can more easily understand.

If they manage to get through, feel free to tell your friends.

My education has included quite a lot of physics (Master of science in technology). How about you?

[Stephen]

I get the sense that neither side of this “debate” is hearing the other.
The Ski Tip Pressure crowd is saying one thing and GS is saying something different (I think).

GS is saying that the binding is a closed system and isn’t “doing” anything.
It can’t, it has no inherent energy source.

What the Ski Tip Pressure crowd is saying @GrimSurfer, is that the binding does something because of the “activity” introduced by the cable. Of course, you are right in trying to correct the idea of the cable “doing” something, but rather than spend all these pages on trying to prove a point, why not try to figure out why there is no one here intelligent enough to understand what you are saying?

Communication is a circular thing: send, receive, confirm receipt to sender.
There are various goals in communication:
Being right, proving a point, impressing people, seeking self-validation, understanding, etc.

Ultimately, the responsibility for being understood falls on the communicator.
People are either not understanding the fairly simple concepts you, @GrimSurfer present, or they are disagreeing with you.
The only thing I have found to disagree with you about is how a more active binding (whether that is a Meidjo NTN, or a cable binding, or one of many others) can transmit more force to the front of the ski than a less active binding, like a 75mm, with no cable.

However, the Ski Tip Pressure crowd is also failing to get across to GS.
You can blame that on him if you want, but he’s an intelligent guy, and quite capable of understanding. What you want to get across isn’t getting through, partly because of the frustration.

A long time ago, if things had been broken down into bite-size pieces, this would probably all be worked out by now.
@GrimSurfer is trying to present complete ideas, but his large number of words is not helping (this is not a scholarly forum — just a bunch of mostly guys interested in various forms of sliding around on snow).
Fewer words, bite-size chunks.
More asking and less telling might help, too.

I don’t know — I’m starting to sound a little out there.
FWIW…