Alpina Alaska XP vs Alaska NNN-BC fit

This is the World Famous TelemarkTalk / TelemarkTips Forum, by far the most dynamic telemark and backcountry skiing discussion board on the world wide web. We have fun here, come on in and be a part of it.
User avatar
lilcliffy
Posts: 4157
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2015 6:20 pm
Location: Stanley, New Brunswick, Canada
Ski style: backcountry Nordic ski touring
Favorite Skis: Asnes Ingstad, Combat Nato, Amundsen, Rabb 68; Altai Kom
Favorite boots: Alpina Alaska BC; Lundhags Expedition; Alfa Skaget XP; Scarpa T4
Occupation: Forestry Professional
Instructor at Maritime College of Forest Technology
Husband, father, farmer and logger

Re: Alpina Alaska XP vs Alaska NNN-BC fit

Post by lilcliffy » Sat Dec 17, 2022 1:06 pm

boby13 wrote:
Tue Dec 06, 2022 9:03 pm

The Alaska BC is a little weird, in size 43 it has a size 44 sole.
The Alaska BC has a deliberate oversized insole.
http://www.telemarktalk.com/viewtopic.p ... =20#p53297
I have confirmed this from Alpina (10 years ago).
I cannot speak for the Alaska XP-

But I have:
- 42 Alaska BC
- 43 Alaska BC
- 42 Guard BC
- 42 Svaristen BC

While the width and volume on these boots is different- the length of the last is not.
In general, a 42 is a "performance fit" for my feet- though the Guard is so wide and high-volume that it is not a performance fit.
The 43 Alaska is significantly longer inside than the 42 boots above.
Cross-country AND down-hill skiing in the backcountry.
Unashamed to be a "cross-country type" and love skiing down-hill.

User avatar
boby13
Posts: 52
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2016 1:54 pm
Location: Mont-Tremblant
Ski style: Intuitive
Favorite Skis: Green FT's, Ingstad, Objective BC, Fischer E88, E99
Favorite boots: Alpina Alaska XP and I have a love/hate relation with the Alfa Free!

Re: Alpina Alaska XP vs Alaska NNN-BC fit

Post by boby13 » Sat Dec 17, 2022 8:27 pm

lilcliffy wrote:
Sat Dec 17, 2022 1:06 pm
The Alaska BC has a deliberate oversized insole.
http://www.telemarktalk.com/viewtopic.p ... =20#p53297
I have confirmed this from Alpina (10 years ago).
I cannot speak for the Alaska XP-
The Alaska XP insole is true to size, the Alaska BC is longer inside. I fact my 43 Alaska XP are pretty much the same length inside as a 42 Alfa Free.



User avatar
GrimSurfer
Posts: 638
Joined: Sun Dec 11, 2022 11:56 am
Ski style: Nordic Backcountry
Favorite Skis: Yes
Favorite boots: Uh huh

Re: Alpina Alaska XP vs Alaska NNN-BC fit

Post by GrimSurfer » Sat Dec 17, 2022 9:22 pm

lilcliffy wrote:
Sat Dec 17, 2022 1:06 pm
The 43 Alaska is significantly longer inside than the 42 boots above.
@lilcliffy

Thanks in advance for the good nights sleep I will get now. Picking up Alaskas for me was easy. Try them on, confirm fit, buy a pair.

It was the purchase for my son in law that was kinda tough. He’s in a different city.

Nice guy. Good dad. Never asked me for anything, other than my daughter’s hand. I asked him what he thought about the Alaskas… he was very reserved. Has other priorities for his hard earned $ (like home and family). I respect that.

So I put together a package for him… Alaskas for the boots. Daughter measured his hat size, hand size, waist size (none of which I needed), followed by his feet (for the Mondo size). Used that, plus a lot of interpretive math to decide on 44s.

Just want the boots to fit outta the box, so we can go for a ski (his first XC… he’s a natural sportsman and has downhill experience). Based on what’s here, and elsewhere, I’m 90% certain 44s will,work.

That’s as good as it needs to be for an old fella these days. The only 100% days left are those watching the grandkids do something talented that surprises me. There’s three of them, so the odds are pretty good.
We dreamed of riding waves of air, water, snow, and energy for centuries. When the conditions were right, the things we needed to achieve this came into being. Every idea man has ever had up to that point about time and space were changed. And it keeps on changing whenever we dream. Bio mechanical jazz, man.



Post Reply