Lighter than NNN BC Alpina Alaskas?
Lighter than NNN BC Alpina Alaskas?
So I've got Alaskas for my Gammes, S Bound Outabound 88s, and Nordic tour skates, but they're kind of overkill for Southern Ontario, and I'd like better kick-and-glide.
However, I want to keep the ankle support, or most of it. What's your opinions of Alpina Snowfields, or BC 1550s? Is Alpina's sizing consistent?
Alternatives? IME, I've had better luck with more traditional, less fussy, ski and hiking boots. The Rossignol and Fischer boots don't appeal; however, you can tell me I'm wrong. Alfa and Crispi are expensive...
Cheers.
However, I want to keep the ankle support, or most of it. What's your opinions of Alpina Snowfields, or BC 1550s? Is Alpina's sizing consistent?
Alternatives? IME, I've had better luck with more traditional, less fussy, ski and hiking boots. The Rossignol and Fischer boots don't appeal; however, you can tell me I'm wrong. Alfa and Crispi are expensive...
Cheers.
- Woodserson
- Posts: 2995
- Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2015 10:25 am
- Location: New Hampshire
- Ski style: Bumps, trees, steeps and long woodsy XC tours
- Occupation: Confused Turn Farmer
Re: Lighter than NNN BC Alpina Alaskas?
Why do you need the ankle support if you don't need the Alaska's? Sounds like you are at cross purposes here. If you need ankle support, Alaska. Otherwise, forego the ankle support.
When I want a lighter less stiff boot for more flatland touring I use the Rossignol BC X10. I've had two pairs. Very capable, budget friendly. I use them a lot. Even use downhill with good success. The Alaska's I keep for charging hard, deeper snow, colder temperatures.
viewtopic.php?t=3292
When I want a lighter less stiff boot for more flatland touring I use the Rossignol BC X10. I've had two pairs. Very capable, budget friendly. I use them a lot. Even use downhill with good success. The Alaska's I keep for charging hard, deeper snow, colder temperatures.
viewtopic.php?t=3292
Re: Lighter than NNN BC Alpina Alaskas?
Thanks. Why? Mostly for a lighter Nordic tour skates set-up; however, that's less needed than lighter XC, so your point stands. Just hoping to have my cake and eat it too.Woodserson wrote: ↑Sun Mar 06, 2022 9:25 amWhy do you need the ankle support if you don't need the Alaska's? Sounds like you are at cross purposes here. If you need ankle support, Alaska. Otherwise, forego the ankle support.
When I want a lighter less stiff boot for more flatland touring I use the Rossignol BC X10. I've had two pairs. Very capable, budget friendly. I use them a lot. Even use downhill with good success. The Alaska's I keep for charging hard, deeper snow, colder temperatures.
viewtopic.php?t=3292
- Woodserson
- Posts: 2995
- Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2015 10:25 am
- Location: New Hampshire
- Ski style: Bumps, trees, steeps and long woodsy XC tours
- Occupation: Confused Turn Farmer
Re: Lighter than NNN BC Alpina Alaskas?
Ah. I use my Alaskas on my skates, and am very happy with them, but I don't know the difference. I have not used my Rossi BC X10's on the skates, mostly because of the better ankle support on the Alaskas.
Lots of people use Lundhags for skating (per the videos I watch on youtube), and I have a pair of Expeditions, which are sold as skating boots, but they certainly don't have a lot of ankle support. Maybe I should try them next time and see, maybe I don't need the support I think I need. Maybe I'm a wuss after all.
Re: Lighter than NNN BC Alpina Alaskas?
Yes, Alaskas work great on the skates, especially over rough ice patches, but I bet a lighter boot would be just fine on better ice - and lighter. I've used Alico NATO Snow March boots and Voile Mountaineer bindings on skates. Works fine. Don't recommend for the weight, LOL.Woodserson wrote: ↑Sun Mar 06, 2022 12:35 pmAh. I use my Alaskas on my skates, and am very happy with them, but I don't know the difference. I have not used my Rossi BC X10's on the skates, mostly because of the better ankle support on the Alaskas.
Lots of people use Lundhags for skating (per the videos I watch on youtube), and I have a pair of Expeditions, which are sold as skating boots, but they certainly don't have a lot of ankle support. Maybe I should try them next time and see, maybe I don't need the support I think I need. Maybe I'm a wuss after all.
- Woodserson
- Posts: 2995
- Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2015 10:25 am
- Location: New Hampshire
- Ski style: Bumps, trees, steeps and long woodsy XC tours
- Occupation: Confused Turn Farmer
Re: Lighter than NNN BC Alpina Alaskas?
I see a fair amount of people with skate bindings and combi boots. If you're going to go all out for the lightness and spend the money anyway. Unless you want one skate with one bindings, then this doesn't work, obvs. We had fantastic skating here in central NH for 2 weeks last month. It had rained a bunch, melted the snow, and then froze rock hard. Wonderful stuff.エイダン.シダル wrote: ↑Sun Mar 06, 2022 4:05 pm
Yes, Alaskas work great on the skates, especially over rough ice patches, but I bet a lighter boot would be just fine on better ice - and lighter. I've used Alico NATO Snow March boots and Voile Mountaineer bindings on skates. Works fine. Don't recommend for the weight, LOL.
- wabene
- Posts: 716
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2021 9:53 am
- Location: Duluth Minnesota
- Ski style: Stiff kneed and wide eyed.
- Favorite Skis: Åsnes Gamme, Fischer SB98, Mashus M50, M78, Pano M62
- Favorite boots: Crispi Svartsen 75mm, Scarpa T4
- Occupation: Carpenter
Re: Lighter than NNN BC Alpina Alaskas?
Italian leather comfort and style
$159 at Telemarkdown. Great deal imo and quite a bit lighter than the Alaska. Great kick and glide boots. Crispi Norland Hook- bwm8142
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2021 2:25 pm
- Location: Alberta
- Ski style: Trying not to fall down
- Favorite Skis: Combat Nato
Re: Lighter than NNN BC Alpina Alaskas?
I would put a plug in for Madshus Glittertind boots actually! I find mine very comfortable, fairly flexible for kick and glide, and light. They also have a ratcheting strap across the upper part of the boot that really locks the ankle and heel in when it's needed. It can be loosened or undone entirely if you want more range of motion.
Re: Lighter than NNN BC Alpina Alaskas?
I've got a line on some lightly used Fischer BCX 6s, I'll pick up for $80 CAD (the price of a tank of gas now) if they fit. Hard to go wrong at the price, though wouldn't pay retail for them.
- lilcliffy
- Posts: 4157
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2015 6:20 pm
- Location: Stanley, New Brunswick, Canada
- Ski style: backcountry Nordic ski touring
- Favorite Skis: Asnes Ingstad, Combat Nato, Amundsen, Rabb 68; Altai Kom
- Favorite boots: Alpina Alaska BC; Lundhags Expedition; Alfa Skaget XP; Scarpa T4
- Occupation: Forestry Professional
Instructor at Maritime College of Forest Technology
Husband, father, farmer and logger
Re: Lighter than NNN BC Alpina Alaskas?
Just a note-
Every model Fischer BCX6 I have seen (including the two gens we have here) are significantly stiffer than the Alaska.
ALFA Kikut/Skarvet/Guard are softer and lighter than the Alaska.
Crispi Svartisen/Lofoten softer and lighter than Alaska.
Every model Fischer BCX6 I have seen (including the two gens we have here) are significantly stiffer than the Alaska.
ALFA Kikut/Skarvet/Guard are softer and lighter than the Alaska.
Crispi Svartisen/Lofoten softer and lighter than Alaska.
Cross-country AND down-hill skiing in the backcountry.
Unashamed to be a "cross-country type" and love skiing down-hill.
Unashamed to be a "cross-country type" and love skiing down-hill.