Fischer Transnordic 66 or 59?

This is the World Famous TelemarkTalk / TelemarkTips Forum, by far the most dynamic telemark and backcountry skiing discussion board on the world wide web. We have fun here, come on in and be a part of it.
Post Reply
aquamogal
Posts: 36
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2018 12:54 pm

Fischer Transnordic 66 or 59?

Post by aquamogal » Thu Jan 06, 2022 10:19 am

Hi looking at Fischer Transnordic 66 or 59 in 190. I have the outback 88 in 179. Looking for more speed, breaking trail in small amounts of fresh snow, and possible track ski. I will be using them with NNNBC alpina alaska and magnum. Thanks Marlow

User avatar
Woodserson
Posts: 2995
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2015 10:25 am
Location: New Hampshire
Ski style: Bumps, trees, steeps and long woodsy XC tours
Occupation: Confused Turn Farmer

Re: Fischer Transnordic 66 or 59?

Post by Woodserson » Thu Jan 06, 2022 10:26 am

59 will fit better in the track, no doubt.
66 will fit marginally. I get it to work but it's not the greatest, the wider shovel and rocker cause it to ride up sometimes making for an inefficient ride.

Trail breaking in a few inches of snow-- probably equivalent. Tough to go wrong here with the 59, I think.



User avatar
riel
Posts: 308
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2020 9:31 pm
Location: New Hampshire
Ski style: BC XC
Favorite Skis: Asnes Gamme, Ingstad & Støretind, Fischer Mountain Cross & E99
Favorite boots: Fischer BCX675
Website: https://surriel.com/
Contact:

Re: Fischer Transnordic 66 or 59?

Post by riel » Thu Jan 06, 2022 10:57 am

aquamogal wrote:
Thu Jan 06, 2022 10:19 am
Hi looking at Fischer Transnordic 66 or 59 in 190. I have the outback 88 in 179. Looking for more speed, breaking trail in small amounts of fresh snow, and possible track ski. I will be using them with NNNBC alpina alaska and magnum. Thanks Marlow
The 59 is marginally faster, while the 66 turns significantly better, especially when going off trail.

If speed and track skiing are the main priority, the 59 is great.

If you want a little more versatility, the 66 is better.



aquamogal
Posts: 36
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2018 12:54 pm

Re: Fischer Transnordic 66 or 59?

Post by aquamogal » Thu Jan 06, 2022 2:53 pm

Great feedback this helps with my direction. happy new year!!



User avatar
fisheater
Posts: 2622
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 8:06 pm
Location: Oakland County, MI
Ski style: All my own, and age doesn't help
Favorite Skis: Gamme 54, Falketind 62, I hope to add a third soon
Favorite boots: Alpina Alaska, Alico Ski March
Occupation: Construction Manager

Re: Fischer Transnordic 66 or 59?

Post by fisheater » Thu Jan 06, 2022 4:46 pm

I don’t know if you have a local dealer, or are committed to a waxless pattern, but Gamme really is a great ski if you are ordering and you are willing to wax.
Gamme does have a rockered yet still stiff tip, with full wrap metal edged, it is not the best ski in tracks. In consolidated snow, or groomed or up to 6” over a base it’s faster than anything I have been on. I say up to 6”, because much more than that I’m looking for turns! I really haven’t skied Gamme in deeper.



User avatar
John Dee
Posts: 274
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2021 8:15 pm

Re: Fischer Transnordic 66 or 59?

Post by John Dee » Thu Jan 06, 2022 6:12 pm

IMO this type of on/off piste ski is pointless. Its sounds like your oriented towards the hard stuff, so I would get the TN59's. If you already have some classic XC skis, I would get the 66's for some variety. Because I have both, I know how fun the 66's are to glide on a little bit of snow, while the 59's deny me of that pleasure.

The Gammes are probably the better ski, stiffer and faster, with a little flotation.

P.S. I also think you need faster boots.



User avatar
lilcliffy
Posts: 4157
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2015 6:20 pm
Location: Stanley, New Brunswick, Canada
Ski style: backcountry Nordic ski touring
Favorite Skis: Asnes Ingstad, Combat Nato, Amundsen, Rabb 68; Altai Kom
Favorite boots: Alpina Alaska BC; Lundhags Expedition; Alfa Skaget XP; Scarpa T4
Occupation: Forestry Professional
Instructor at Maritime College of Forest Technology
Husband, father, farmer and logger

Re: Fischer Transnordic 66 or 59?

Post by lilcliffy » Thu Jan 06, 2022 8:40 pm

John Dee wrote:
Thu Jan 06, 2022 6:12 pm
P.S. I also think you need faster boots.
Recommendations?
Cross-country AND down-hill skiing in the backcountry.
Unashamed to be a "cross-country type" and love skiing down-hill.



aquamogal
Posts: 36
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2018 12:54 pm

Re: Fischer Transnordic 66 or 59?

Post by aquamogal » Thu Jan 06, 2022 10:11 pm

Thanks again great feedback! We do have classic ski’s for tracks. So looking more at 66. What would you suggest for faster boot that is nnnbc?



User avatar
John Dee
Posts: 274
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2021 8:15 pm

Re: Fischer Transnordic 66 or 59?

Post by John Dee » Fri Jan 07, 2022 12:26 am

Going fast on skis is like running. Running requires freedom of movement in your feet. The way I see it is that backcountry boots are like hiking boots, while XC boots are like running shoes. I'm not going to subject my feet to running in hiking boots.

I have OTX5s. They're really comfy, but the outer mesh has shredded quickly and there will soon be holes. There's a lot of other nnnbc boots that are like glorified XC boots. They're like entry/crossover boots. If you out for speed you might enjoy pairing it down to some lighter boots.



Post Reply