Salomon QST85?
Salomon QST85?
I've seen a few posts on the QST92s - 99s, but I've noticed there are some decently priced 85s around. From what I can tell, the difference is that the wider models are reinforced with carbon. I'm wondering if I should stay away from these and jump up to the 92s or something... anyone had any success with the 85s?
I guess my concern would be the bindings popping off but other than a solid wood core i'm not sure what I should be looking for
Here's the product URL: https://www.salomon.com/en-ca/shop/product/qst-85.html
Thanks!
Shayne
I guess my concern would be the bindings popping off but other than a solid wood core i'm not sure what I should be looking for
Here's the product URL: https://www.salomon.com/en-ca/shop/product/qst-85.html
Thanks!
Shayne
Re: Salomon QST85?
hmm maybe I found the answer - categorized as a telemark ski on this site https://www.sport-conrad.com/en/product ... st-85.html
And I see references in google with the Meidjo binding... though i'm going to be using a 22designs vice...
And I see references in google with the Meidjo binding... though i'm going to be using a 22designs vice...
- Montana St Alum
- Posts: 1283
- Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2020 6:42 pm
- Location: Wasatch, Utah
- Ski style: Old dog, new school
- Favorite Skis: Blizzard Rustler 9/10
- Favorite boots: Tx Pro
- Occupation: Retired, unemployable
Re: Salomon QST85?
Yeah, I don't think binding retention will be a problem:
"Ti Binding Reinforcement: A titanal insert edge-to-edge underfoot, running throughout the ski, for maximal power and increased hard snow edging."
If you're really worried, you could put in a couple of "Binding Freedom" inserts in the high stress areas, but probably not needed.
"Ti Binding Reinforcement: A titanal insert edge-to-edge underfoot, running throughout the ski, for maximal power and increased hard snow edging."
If you're really worried, you could put in a couple of "Binding Freedom" inserts in the high stress areas, but probably not needed.
Re: Salomon QST85?
Thank you! Looks legit, I think I will go for it
Montana St Alum wrote: ↑Wed Nov 03, 2021 12:43 pmYeah, I don't think binding retention will be a problem:
"Ti Binding Reinforcement: A titanal insert edge-to-edge underfoot, running throughout the ski, for maximal power and increased hard snow edging."
If you're really worried, you could put in a couple of "Binding Freedom" inserts in the high stress areas, but probably not needed.
- Woodserson
- Posts: 2996
- Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2015 10:25 am
- Location: New Hampshire
- Ski style: Bumps, trees, steeps and long woodsy XC tours
- Occupation: Confused Turn Farmer
Re: Salomon QST85?
Yes, go for it. To second MSU's opinion, binding pullout is not going to be a problem. Titanal layer underfoot is as burly as it gets for mounting. I don't think carbon helps binding retention at all, anyway.Montana St Alum wrote: ↑Wed Nov 03, 2021 12:43 pmYeah, I don't think binding retention will be a problem:
"Ti Binding Reinforcement: A titanal insert edge-to-edge underfoot, running throughout the ski, for maximal power and increased hard snow edging."
If you're really worried, you could put in a couple of "Binding Freedom" inserts in the high stress areas, but probably not needed.
I also think carbon in skis harshes the mellow of the ride and is generally useless in skis unless you want an ultralightweight stiff skimo ski. But people love their carbon!
- Gustav_H78
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2020 3:46 pm
- Location: Gothenburg
- Ski style: Fast big turns
- Favorite Skis: Klint
- Occupation: Engineer
Re: Salomon QST85?
Im more than happy with my QST 99 with Rottefella NTN and Scarpa boots. Both in and off pist!
The QST range are very competent skiis.
The QST range are very competent skiis.
Gustav