Shift Plates?

This is the World Famous TelemarkTalk / TelemarkTips Forum, by far the most dynamic telemark and backcountry skiing discussion board on the world wide web. We have fun here, come on in and be a part of it.
Post Reply
User avatar
voilenerd
Posts: 161
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2018 9:26 am

Shift Plates?

Post by voilenerd » Sat Dec 01, 2018 10:36 pm

Anyone try B & D shift plates out or another brand of plates? I was thinking about getting set for my Voile Hardwire bindings to mess around with binding placement.

User avatar
joeatomictoad
Posts: 371
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:20 pm
Location: Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
Ski style: Yes, please.
Favorite Skis: Nordica Enforcer 93; Icelantic Saba Pro 117; 22D HH & Vice
Favorite boots: Scarpa T1
Occupation: I make sure ships float.

Re: Shift Plates?

Post by joeatomictoad » Sun Apr 11, 2021 6:46 pm

Nobody tried any shift plates? They seem rather simple, but those are usually the last words of the ignorant. Maybe y'all lobbying for us to infuse more money into the binding market to get better R&D?

(Inform @twopass of yet another conspiracy. :lol: )



User avatar
joeatomictoad
Posts: 371
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:20 pm
Location: Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
Ski style: Yes, please.
Favorite Skis: Nordica Enforcer 93; Icelantic Saba Pro 117; 22D HH & Vice
Favorite boots: Scarpa T1
Occupation: I make sure ships float.

Re: Shift Plates?

Post by joeatomictoad » Tue Apr 20, 2021 6:39 pm

This is the last time for this thread... I promise. Unless there's any message traffic on this thread besides myself

Recently procured another pair of skis. Need to decide if I want either:
  • another set of bindings, OR

Scarpa T1, 75-mm boots; with 22D Vice traps. Intended for 100% "down". I am comparing value, performance, practicality, quiver creep sustainability, etc. If anyone has any experience, pros/cons, or any opinion on the matter, would appreciate your thoughts.



User avatar
lowangle al
Posts: 2755
Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2014 3:36 pm
Location: Pocono Mts / Chugach Mts
Ski style: BC with focus on downhill perfection
Favorite Skis: powder skis
Favorite boots: Scarpa T4
Occupation: Retired cement mason. Current job is to take my recreation as serious as I did my past employment.

Re: Shift Plates?

Post by lowangle al » Tue Apr 20, 2021 6:58 pm

I just found out that they exist so I'm not that surprised by the lack of response. I'm curious too, it seem like they would be a good alternative to inserts with the additional benefit of being able to move your bindings.



User avatar
oggopoggo
Posts: 41
Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2015 10:45 pm

Re: Shift Plates?

Post by oggopoggo » Wed Apr 21, 2021 12:14 am

I've used the US, but not the European ones. Alignment is really easy with the long plate. Pick a middle position for the binding and you can adjust it later. With one pair of skis in a variety of conditions you can move it for powder or hardback performance.



User avatar
joeatomictoad
Posts: 371
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:20 pm
Location: Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
Ski style: Yes, please.
Favorite Skis: Nordica Enforcer 93; Icelantic Saba Pro 117; 22D HH & Vice
Favorite boots: Scarpa T1
Occupation: I make sure ships float.

Re: Shift Plates?

Post by joeatomictoad » Wed Apr 21, 2021 12:22 pm

oggopoggo wrote:
Wed Apr 21, 2021 12:14 am
I've used the US, but not the European ones. Alignment is really easy with the long plate. Pick a middle position for the binding and you can adjust it later. With one pair of skis in a variety of conditions you can move it for powder or hardback performance.
Thanks. So far seems rather straightforward.



User avatar
mikesee
Posts: 245
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2020 11:46 am
Location: northern rockies
Ski style: Tours for turns
Occupation: Wheelsmith
Website: http://www.LaceMine29.com

Re: Shift Plates?

Post by mikesee » Tue May 11, 2021 1:31 am

I used a pair this winter to figure out where I wanted my bindings to live before permanently mounting them.

Ideal for that.



User avatar
breckbaldwin
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2021 11:16 pm

Re: Shift Plates?

Post by breckbaldwin » Sun Sep 26, 2021 12:19 am

I am a heavy user of B&D shift plates for three reasons
1) Swap bindings easily
2) Get some riser effects for carving skis, race skis
3) Mess about with binding position +-1 inch or so.

Inserts like Binding Freedom do 1) well and are preferred for fat skis since I don't want any riser, I have started using that system and actually have shift plates mounted on the inserts since shiftplates are expensive..

I have only used Hammer Heads. Axl and Outlaw X bindings.

Regarding 3) I am somewhat embarrassed to say that I am not very aware of mount point. I have put full forward on one slalom ski, full back on the other and can't feel a difference free skiing. I have tried this more than once with other sorts of skis, DPS Wailers could not have cared less. I didn't do the race ski evals on a course so I may have missed some stuff. My tele times are within 10-15% of college trained racers skiing alpine in my age in slalom so I don't totally suck.
The one time I leaned on adjustability of the shift plates was with DPS Lotus 120s mounted neutrally that I moved back to help with tip float in Hokkaido powder--super light fluffy stuff. No serious evaluation of whether it helped.

One downside to my shiftplates is that they are aluminium and have taken a permanent up bend from the flex of the ski.

So overall shift plates have worked for me as risers and to experiment, negatively for my insensate self, the impact of binding position with the economic benefits of keeping my binding count down.

Breck



User avatar
joeatomictoad
Posts: 371
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2020 9:20 pm
Location: Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
Ski style: Yes, please.
Favorite Skis: Nordica Enforcer 93; Icelantic Saba Pro 117; 22D HH & Vice
Favorite boots: Scarpa T1
Occupation: I make sure ships float.

Re: Shift Plates?

Post by joeatomictoad » Sun Sep 26, 2021 12:59 pm

Got a set. Mounted them up with 22D Vice bindings. Looking forward to trying this upcoming season.

One possible issue....
The width of the shift plates are substantially less than the width of the binding mount itself; the binding overhangs the shift plate several mm's on both sides.

In respect to Newtonian mechanics, physics, moments, and lever arms... I wonder if there's any penalty having less width contacting the ski. There probably is some reduction of moment from boot - to - ski, and I probably will never notice it as I am not a highly tuned racing machine. Then again, the increased height adds some moment. Maybe it's a wash.

On the bright side, trapped moisture underneath the binding has an easier time to evaporate. And, the plates can be mounted on some quite skinny skis.



Post Reply