Switchback X2 with Dynastar Legend 96 -- OK? Or not OK?
- rongon
- Posts: 178
- Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2014 9:09 pm
- Location: NY State 'Forever Wild'
- Ski style: Wanderer - XCD, telemark
- Favorite Skis: Fischer Excursion 88 (3-Pins), Madshus Annum (Switchback), Elan Ripstick 96 (Switchback X2)
- Favorite boots: Asolo Extreme, Crispi CXP
- Occupation: I work to live
- Website: http://skinortheast.com
Switchback X2 with Dynastar Legend 96 -- OK? Or not OK?
Querying the telemark hive mind...
For the last five seasons or so, I've been skiing a pair of 2014 Dynastar Cham 97 High Mountain skis with Axl bindings on them. That combination has been working very well for me. No real issues except that I think I chose too short a length of those skis, 172 cm. So I pounced when I found a pair of Dynastar Legend 96 skis in 177 cm going for very cheap. (The Legend 96 is basically the Cham 97 with tweaks to the shape.)
I have a pair of Voile Switchback X2 waiting in the wings. The question I have is, will I be putting too much stress on that binding with a 7+ lb/pair ski like the Legend 96? Or do I really need a beefier/heavier binding like the Axl on there?
My boots are Crispi CXP. I also have a pair of Crispi XP waiting in the wings for when the CXPs finally wear out (they're getting there, just not quite there yet).
Go with the X2s? Yea or nay?
--
For the last five seasons or so, I've been skiing a pair of 2014 Dynastar Cham 97 High Mountain skis with Axl bindings on them. That combination has been working very well for me. No real issues except that I think I chose too short a length of those skis, 172 cm. So I pounced when I found a pair of Dynastar Legend 96 skis in 177 cm going for very cheap. (The Legend 96 is basically the Cham 97 with tweaks to the shape.)
I have a pair of Voile Switchback X2 waiting in the wings. The question I have is, will I be putting too much stress on that binding with a 7+ lb/pair ski like the Legend 96? Or do I really need a beefier/heavier binding like the Axl on there?
My boots are Crispi CXP. I also have a pair of Crispi XP waiting in the wings for when the CXPs finally wear out (they're getting there, just not quite there yet).
Go with the X2s? Yea or nay?
--
- Montana St Alum
- Posts: 1205
- Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2020 6:42 pm
- Location: Wasatch, Utah
- Ski style: Old dog, new school
- Favorite Skis: Blizzard Rustler 9/10
- Favorite boots: Tx Pro
- Occupation: Retired, unemployable
Re: Switchback X2 with Dynastar Legend 96 -- OK? Or not OK?
I'm 5'9" and 160 lbs. I drove around a pair of 185cm Armada JJ's (at 116 underfoot and 9.5+ pounds) for a year on T2 Eco's and Hammerheads, then Axls. I know you can do it, but part of the problem is that, when you're used to something like the Axl, going to a binding that may have less control or is significantly less active it's a noticeable step back.
If you're currently running the Axl on its most neutral setting, it may be fine. If you're running it on position 2, it might take a bit to get used to the X2. If that's the case, just give it a while for you to get used to the difference. Initially, you may not like it at all.
It also depends on how hard you drive the skis and how concerned you are with durability. If you're backcountry a lot driving hard, I'd stick with the Axls for their robust reliability and the 6 screw Vs. 4 screw attachment.
If you're currently running the Axl on its most neutral setting, it may be fine. If you're running it on position 2, it might take a bit to get used to the X2. If that's the case, just give it a while for you to get used to the difference. Initially, you may not like it at all.
It also depends on how hard you drive the skis and how concerned you are with durability. If you're backcountry a lot driving hard, I'd stick with the Axls for their robust reliability and the 6 screw Vs. 4 screw attachment.
- Rodbelan
- Posts: 904
- Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 8:53 am
- Location: à la journée
- Ski style: Very stylish
- Favorite Skis: Splitkein
- Favorite boots: Alpina Blaze and my beloved Alpina Sports Jr
- Occupation: Tea drinker
Re: Switchback X2 with Dynastar Legend 96 -- OK? Or not OK?
The binding can take it, do not worry. And with those boots, you will be fine. But it is not a question we can answer objectively, factually... It all depends on you buddy! Give it a try! You'll be set...rongon wrote: ↑Tue Apr 13, 2021 2:45 pmQuerying the telemark hive mind...
For the last five seasons or so, I've been skiing a pair of 2014 Dynastar Cham 97 High Mountain skis with Axl bindings on them. That combination has been working very well for me. No real issues except that I think I chose too short a length of those skis, 172 cm. So I pounced when I found a pair of Dynastar Legend 96 skis in 177 cm going for very cheap. (The Legend 96 is basically the Cham 97 with tweaks to the shape.)
I have a pair of Voile Switchback X2 waiting in the wings. The question I have is, will I be putting too much stress on that binding with a 7+ lb/pair ski like the Legend 96? Or do I really need a beefier/heavier binding like the Axl on there?
My boots are Crispi CXP. I also have a pair of Crispi XP waiting in the wings for when the CXPs finally wear out (they're getting there, just not quite there yet).
Go with the X2s? Yea or nay?
--
É y fa ty fret? On é ty ben dun ti cotton waté?
célèbre et ancien chant celtique
célèbre et ancien chant celtique
- Woodserson
- Posts: 2995
- Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2015 10:25 am
- Location: New Hampshire
- Ski style: Bumps, trees, steeps and long woodsy XC tours
- Occupation: Confused Turn Farmer
Re: Switchback X2 with Dynastar Legend 96 -- OK? Or not OK?
Agree with both posts above. The binding is fine, but will you like it after coming off the Axls? I find the X2 is somewhere between Axl/Vice position 1 and 2. It doesn't mean you can't adjust, btw. Just something to keep in mind. I keep my X2's now on my touring skis and I seem to do fine. It's a great binding.
- faizanmazhar00
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2022 4:25 am
Re: Switchback X2 with Dynastar Legend 96 -- OK? Or not OK?
Agree with both posts above. The binding is fine, but will you like it after coming off the Axls? I find the X2 is somewhere between Axl/Vice position 1 and 2. It doesn't mean you can't adjust, btw. Just something to keep in mind.rongon wrote: ↑Tue Apr 13, 2021 2:45 pmQuerying the telemark hive mind...
For the last five seasons or so, I've been skiing a pair of 2014 Dynastar Cham 97 High Mountain skis with Axl bindings on them. That combination has been working very well for me. No real issues except that I think I chose too short a length of those skis, 172 cm. So I pounced when I found a pair of Dynastar Legend 96 skis in 177 cm going for very cheap. (The Legend 96 is basically the Cham 97 with tweaks to the shape.)
I have a pair of Voile Switchback X2 waiting in the wings. The question I have is, will I be putting too much stress on that binding with a 7+ lb/pair ski like the Legend 96? Or do I really need a beefier/heavier binding like the Axl on there?
My boots are Crispi CXP. I also have a pair of Crispi XP waiting in the wings for when the CXPs finally wear out (they're getting there, just not quite there yet).
Go with the X2s? Yea or nay?
--
- rongon
- Posts: 178
- Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2014 9:09 pm
- Location: NY State 'Forever Wild'
- Ski style: Wanderer - XCD, telemark
- Favorite Skis: Fischer Excursion 88 (3-Pins), Madshus Annum (Switchback), Elan Ripstick 96 (Switchback X2)
- Favorite boots: Asolo Extreme, Crispi CXP
- Occupation: I work to live
- Website: http://skinortheast.com
Re: Switchback X2 with Dynastar Legend 96 -- OK? Or not OK?
Sorry I missed your reply.
So... I went with the Switchback X2 bindings on the Legend 96 skis. I think they ski fine. I like the lightness, and I actually don't like the super-active feel that's all the rage these days. But that has a lot to do with my own physical limitations. I feel more comfortable with a somewhat loosey-goosey setup.
So... I went with the Switchback X2 bindings on the Legend 96 skis. I think they ski fine. I like the lightness, and I actually don't like the super-active feel that's all the rage these days. But that has a lot to do with my own physical limitations. I feel more comfortable with a somewhat loosey-goosey setup.