lilcliffy wrote: ↑Sun Jan 19, 2020 3:07 pm
Happy New Year free-heel skiers!
Despite a rain-induced meltdown in mid-December that ruined our hero snow that started in mid-October- the ski touring has been superb and we are gradually getting buried alive with- as of yesterday a solid metre of base- and 30+cm of fresh cold powder coming down today! I was out for a mid-day tour and the fresh powder is above my knees!
Wishing you all the best and hoping you are all getting out for a tur!
(My daughter wishes that Santa brought her Nordic skates!)
-
(I was going to send this as a PM, but couldn’t figure out how to get the picture in the PM!)
Hey lilcliffy,
I just came across this picture, and those Gammes look long for your height (based on current standards).
I forget your weight, but anyway, just curious how that length is working out for you?
Partly I ask because I’m still stuck on the “tips to wrist” sizing standard, which that looks close to.
That doesn’t work for me these days because I’m 6’3” (but only 160 pounds).
I used to ski 220s.
I have been having a hard time, mentally, scaling sizes down to current standards.
I got a pair of MR48s in 210 that I’m looking forward to skiing, and have a set of FT62s on order in 188 (but was really tempted to go to 196).
I justified the 188 by thinking I would get a longer ski someplace in between the MR48 and FT62 (Gamme, Nansen, or Ingstad). Right now, thinking Nansen in 205.
Any thoughts / comments / suggestions are appreciated!
Thanks,
Stephen