This is the World Famous TelemarkTalk / TelemarkTips / Telemark Francais Forum, by far the most dynamic telemark and backcountry skiing discussion board on the world wide web since 1998. East, West, North, South, Canada, US or Europe, Backcountry or not.
This is the World Famous TelemarkTalk / TelemarkTips / Telemark Francais Forum, by far the most dynamic telemark and backcountry skiing discussion board on the world wide web since 1998. East, West, North, South, Canada, US or Europe, Backcountry or not.
This is the World Famous TelemarkTalk / TelemarkTips Forum, by far the most dynamic telemark and backcountry skiing discussion board on the world wide web. We have fun here, come on in and be a part of it.
MikeK wrote:Boot center for freeheel doesn't make much sense to me.
AMEN.
Well, that's where Voile puts it, G3 says 0.5 cm behind the alpine boot center, and Black Diamond says on the line or up to 2.5 cm behind it if you want a traditional mount. I wouldn't say it makes little sense. I would start with the location the ski maker recommends and modify as you think necessary.
2.5cm behind alpine BC seems more inline with what most XCD skis are using (although none have the marks for BC). Just in terms of relation to BOF and center of foot and also in terms of where balance may be.
I bet Rossi will say use BP. I'd say with a ski like that, go a bit forward of BP.
In my simple mind looking at the skis I've owned, BP (for most skis) looks kind of far back, and Alpine BC looks way far forward (for XCD). Pretty much all my skis but my most XC ones are in between those two points... well except my S Bounds, because the balance point is farther forward on those than any other ski.
Connyro - Even with my S Bounds 98s with 3 pins mounted on balance, they still raise up the tip when I lift my foot. It must be the heel riser is heavy and far back enough to make this happen.
connyro wrote:FWIW: I do a LOT of trail breaking (lazy friends and/or solo) so I like my XCD setup to have the tails a little heavy so the tips rise when striding/climbing through deep unbroken snow. Not much, but just enough so the tips tend to rise when picking up your foot.
Geeez... This is a BRILLIANT idea!!! How come I never thought of this before? You're a genius RonnyCon!
Now if only they could start making NIS plates and XCelerator-type BC bindings... Guess I'll have to make it myself... (That was half of my secret binding... )
/...\ Peace, Love, Telemark and Tofu /...\ "And if you like to risk your neck, we'll boom down Sutton in old Quebec..."
Thanks, but I asked him already... He said he was too busy "wherking" or something like that... Something to do with his "djab"... Not sure what he meant...
/...\ Peace, Love, Telemark and Tofu /...\ "And if you like to risk your neck, we'll boom down Sutton in old Quebec..."
When I got my fischer SB 112s mounted I took the Paul Parker recommended approach and did pins over cord center. I wanted the ski to turn as well or better than it kick and glided.
My wife is looking at Rossi BC 110s, with a voile switchback. Would anyone else take this same approach with the Rossi?
Planning on using the BC-110 as primarily a downhill ski? The switchback is a very powerful Telemark binding. And- there is no kick & glide mode to the switchback.