Fischer E-109 vs. Asnes Ingstad

This is the World Famous TelemarkTalk / TelemarkTips Forum, by far the most dynamic telemark and backcountry skiing discussion board on the world wide web. We have fun here, come on in and be a part of it.
User avatar
lilcliffy
Posts: 4285
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2015 6:20 pm
Location: Stanley, New Brunswick, Canada
Ski style: backcountry Nordic ski touring
Favorite Skis: Asnes Ingstad, Combat Nato, Amundsen, Rabb 68; Altai Kom
Favorite boots: Alpina Alaska BC; Lundhags Expedition; Alfa Skaget XP; Scarpa T4
Occupation: Forestry Professional
Instructor at Maritime College of Forest Technology
Husband, father, farmer and logger

Re: Fischer E-109 vs. Asnes Ingstad

Post by lilcliffy » Sun Feb 14, 2016 7:38 pm

Hmmm...I have grown out of the need for aggressive sidecut- at least when it comes to downhill skiing with my BC-XC setups (e.g. Alpina Alaska NNNBC).

(I do still appreciate sidecut on Telemark setups- with the power to steer skis)

But with or without sidecut- I think that a 270cm ski is clearly a gentle terrain ski...

However-on a lot of my local tours I can plot tours that would keep the slopes manageable enough for a 270cm ski...I typically take in the steeper terrain because I want to- not because I have to.

Well- I want both! A mid-width XCD ski to replace my Eons (too soft), and a mid-width Finnish hunting ski!
Cross-country AND down-hill skiing in the backcountry.
Unashamed to be a "cross-country type" and love skiing down-hill.

User avatar
bgregoire
Posts: 1511
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2014 9:31 am
Ski style: Nordic backcountry touring with lots of turns
Favorite Skis: Fisher E99 & Boundless (98), Åsnes Ingstad, K2 Wayback 88
Favorite boots: Crispi Sydpolen, Alico Teletour & Alfa Polar

Re: Fischer E-109 vs. Asnes Ingstad

Post by bgregoire » Sun Feb 14, 2016 7:48 pm

We'll there is no other way around it, if the instad won't cut it, we're going to have to produce our OWN line of XCD skis. I'm amount a 25 minute drive from a ski and snowboard production shop that, the last i heard, was produced many skis for altai. i don't know, can we get them onboard? :lol:
I live for the Telemark arc....The feeeeeeel.....I ski miles to get to a place where there is guaranteed snow to do the deal....TM



User avatar
lilcliffy
Posts: 4285
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2015 6:20 pm
Location: Stanley, New Brunswick, Canada
Ski style: backcountry Nordic ski touring
Favorite Skis: Asnes Ingstad, Combat Nato, Amundsen, Rabb 68; Altai Kom
Favorite boots: Alpina Alaska BC; Lundhags Expedition; Alfa Skaget XP; Scarpa T4
Occupation: Forestry Professional
Instructor at Maritime College of Forest Technology
Husband, father, farmer and logger

Re: Fischer E-109 vs. Asnes Ingstad

Post by lilcliffy » Sun Feb 14, 2016 7:50 pm

bgregoire wrote: Looking at the specs of both skis, their camber could be quite different. Asnes recommends a 196cm Amundsen while sporten recommends a 170cm ranger at my weight. Actually the Ranger seems more like a stiffer Rossignol BC70 to me.
Yeah- the BC70 is very stiff isn't it? I could never figure out why they don't offer the BC70 with a waxable base....All that stiffness and no grip on cold snow? Strange idea...
Yesterday, I was even able to execute some crazy tele turns on them down a closed forest road (using NNN BC mind you), as long as I really committed myself to the moves (deep lunges, poles in the air a la Barnett).
I am picturing this- very easily- because I have had the same experience many times! :lol:

Downhill skiing on a stiff double-cambered ski, in a classic xcountry length, is a wild, wild ride!

I am having fun skiing them for extended periods on one foot. Don't know where that comes from.
Do you mean in K&G or in downhill turns?
and that the only other ski I would look into buying at the moment is something like a waxable Boundless.
The Boundless was the same profile as the S-98- right?
Cross-country AND down-hill skiing in the backcountry.
Unashamed to be a "cross-country type" and love skiing down-hill.



User avatar
bgregoire
Posts: 1511
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2014 9:31 am
Ski style: Nordic backcountry touring with lots of turns
Favorite Skis: Fisher E99 & Boundless (98), Åsnes Ingstad, K2 Wayback 88
Favorite boots: Crispi Sydpolen, Alico Teletour & Alfa Polar

Re: Fischer E-109 vs. Asnes Ingstad

Post by bgregoire » Sun Feb 14, 2016 7:52 pm

I am having fun skiing them for extended periods on one foot. Don't know where that comes from.
Do you mean in K&G or in downhill turns?

Mostly double poling and low angle downs. My point being they are a very stable platform. More than my wider 10th Mtns.
and that the only other ski I would look into buying at the moment is something like a waxable Boundless.
The Boundless was the same profile as the S-98- right?[/quote]

Yup. Came in waxable though. Tut tut.
Last edited by bgregoire on Sun Feb 14, 2016 8:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I live for the Telemark arc....The feeeeeeel.....I ski miles to get to a place where there is guaranteed snow to do the deal....TM



MikeK

Re: Fischer E-109 vs. Asnes Ingstad

Post by MikeK » Sun Feb 14, 2016 7:55 pm

bgregoire wrote:Yesterday, I was even able to execute some crazy tele turns on them down a closed forest road (using NNN BC mind you), as long as I really committed myself to the moves (deep lunges, poles in the air a la Barnett).
.
Isn't this how you are supposed to do it?

Wasn't I mumbling about that on some other thread? Drive the skis down into the snow! Feel them bend! :lol: :lol:



User avatar
lilcliffy
Posts: 4285
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2015 6:20 pm
Location: Stanley, New Brunswick, Canada
Ski style: backcountry Nordic ski touring
Favorite Skis: Asnes Ingstad, Combat Nato, Amundsen, Rabb 68; Altai Kom
Favorite boots: Alpina Alaska BC; Lundhags Expedition; Alfa Skaget XP; Scarpa T4
Occupation: Forestry Professional
Instructor at Maritime College of Forest Technology
Husband, father, farmer and logger

Re: Fischer E-109 vs. Asnes Ingstad

Post by lilcliffy » Sun Feb 14, 2016 8:07 pm

bgregoire wrote:
Mostly double poling and low angle downs.
Cool. When it comes to downhill skiing on BC-XC equipment, I have come to completely rely on being able to balance on one leg during turn transitions.

I have also been experimenting- with success- with Gamme's "beginner" telemark technique (from the video you posted) of steering the outside/leading ski, and lifting the inside/trailing ski. I find this works well on consolidated snow.
Yup. Came in waxable though. Tut tut.
Yeah-I know. Want one too.
Cross-country AND down-hill skiing in the backcountry.
Unashamed to be a "cross-country type" and love skiing down-hill.



User avatar
lilcliffy
Posts: 4285
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2015 6:20 pm
Location: Stanley, New Brunswick, Canada
Ski style: backcountry Nordic ski touring
Favorite Skis: Asnes Ingstad, Combat Nato, Amundsen, Rabb 68; Altai Kom
Favorite boots: Alpina Alaska BC; Lundhags Expedition; Alfa Skaget XP; Scarpa T4
Occupation: Forestry Professional
Instructor at Maritime College of Forest Technology
Husband, father, farmer and logger

Re: Fischer E-109 vs. Asnes Ingstad

Post by lilcliffy » Sun Feb 14, 2016 8:13 pm

bgregoire wrote:We'll there is no other way around it, if the instad won't cut it, we're going to have to produce our OWN line of XCD skis. I'm amount a 25 minute drive from a ski and snowboard production shop that, the last i heard, was produced many skis for altai. i don't know, can we get them onboard? :lol:
Well- I don't know yet whether the Ingstad will cut it...but Gamme's disappointment/surprise with the lack of flotation of the Ingstad doesn't surprise me with a 62mm waist...

Well- I would love to get Altai on board...
Cross-country AND down-hill skiing in the backcountry.
Unashamed to be a "cross-country type" and love skiing down-hill.



User avatar
bgregoire
Posts: 1511
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2014 9:31 am
Ski style: Nordic backcountry touring with lots of turns
Favorite Skis: Fisher E99 & Boundless (98), Åsnes Ingstad, K2 Wayback 88
Favorite boots: Crispi Sydpolen, Alico Teletour & Alfa Polar

Re: Fischer E-109 vs. Asnes Ingstad

Post by bgregoire » Sun Feb 14, 2016 8:21 pm

lilcliffy wrote:
bgregoire wrote:
Yup. Came in waxable though. Tut tut.
Yeah-I know. Want one too.
They got very little camber though...apparently...
I live for the Telemark arc....The feeeeeeel.....I ski miles to get to a place where there is guaranteed snow to do the deal....TM



User avatar
bgregoire
Posts: 1511
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2014 9:31 am
Ski style: Nordic backcountry touring with lots of turns
Favorite Skis: Fisher E99 & Boundless (98), Åsnes Ingstad, K2 Wayback 88
Favorite boots: Crispi Sydpolen, Alico Teletour & Alfa Polar

Re: Fischer E-109 vs. Asnes Ingstad

Post by bgregoire » Sun Feb 14, 2016 8:23 pm

MikeK wrote:
bgregoire wrote:Yesterday, I was even able to execute some crazy tele turns on them down a closed forest road (using NNN BC mind you), as long as I really committed myself to the moves (deep lunges, poles in the air a la Barnett).
.
Isn't this how you are supposed to do it?

Wasn't I mumbling about that on some other thread? Drive the skis down into the snow! Feel them bend! :lol: :lol:
Sure, it's not like I invented anything here. I just felt like some crazy madman flying out of control, but somehow staying put on my two feet.
Last edited by bgregoire on Sun Feb 14, 2016 8:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I live for the Telemark arc....The feeeeeeel.....I ski miles to get to a place where there is guaranteed snow to do the deal....TM



MikeK

Re: Fischer E-109 vs. Asnes Ingstad

Post by MikeK » Sun Feb 14, 2016 8:30 pm

bgregoire wrote: Sure, it's not like I invented anything here. I just felt like some crazy madman flying out of control, but somehow staying but on my two feet.
Sounds like XCD to me ;)



Post Reply