22Designs mounting point and adjustment
Posted: Wed Feb 23, 2022 12:28 pm
I'm currently drafting up some hole pattern templates to mount inserts for both Alpine and Telemark (with multiple options too) on my skis. I currently have my Outlaws mounted with my boot center pretty much on the same line I was using for alpine I think, maybe with a little bit of deviation due to originally being mounted with AXLs or to locate the holes nicely with the constraints of the previous mounting holes. I dunno if it's because I'm still learning to drop a knee or I just don't have them mounted in the ideal location for telemark, or if relatively short twintips with a lot of rocker just aren't ideal tele skis (ON3P Jeffrey 114), but I'm sometimes feeling like I should have mounted them a bit further back.
Luckily the hole pattern for these bindings seems to lend itself well to providing a bit of adjustment due to the consistent 1.5" hole spacing. My plan for these skis is to simply add another pair of holes and bunch of inserts so that I have the option of setting them back by 1.5" (3.8 cm), is this too much of a jump back? I have seen so much conflicting information on peoples preference for mount points that I am unsure what would be best to try. I also plan on putting inserts in the old holes just so that I have the option to run my skis with alpine bindings, but after drawing up some plans that currently is seeming to add a heavyhanded constraint to how fine of an adjustment I'm allowed.
Anyways I've been going down the rabbit hole drafting up all of the geometric possibilities for mounting holes and it seems like the best options are to have increments of adjustment of 0.5" (12.7mm) or 0.75mm (19mm). Going to have a chat with someone at Binding Freedom to confirm if 0.5" is too close or not.
Hopefully someone can be a voice of reason before I commit to putting 60 holes in a pair of new skis. 30 inserts per ski at 0.5" increments for a total adjustment range of 2" (50mm). Is this experiment even worth attempting or will I probably be happy just adding 3 extra holes per ski and call it a day at a single 1.5" adjustment increment?
Luckily the hole pattern for these bindings seems to lend itself well to providing a bit of adjustment due to the consistent 1.5" hole spacing. My plan for these skis is to simply add another pair of holes and bunch of inserts so that I have the option of setting them back by 1.5" (3.8 cm), is this too much of a jump back? I have seen so much conflicting information on peoples preference for mount points that I am unsure what would be best to try. I also plan on putting inserts in the old holes just so that I have the option to run my skis with alpine bindings, but after drawing up some plans that currently is seeming to add a heavyhanded constraint to how fine of an adjustment I'm allowed.
Anyways I've been going down the rabbit hole drafting up all of the geometric possibilities for mounting holes and it seems like the best options are to have increments of adjustment of 0.5" (12.7mm) or 0.75mm (19mm). Going to have a chat with someone at Binding Freedom to confirm if 0.5" is too close or not.
Hopefully someone can be a voice of reason before I commit to putting 60 holes in a pair of new skis. 30 inserts per ski at 0.5" increments for a total adjustment range of 2" (50mm). Is this experiment even worth attempting or will I probably be happy just adding 3 extra holes per ski and call it a day at a single 1.5" adjustment increment?