Fischer E-109 vs. Asnes Ingstad

This is the World Famous TelemarkTalk / TelemarkTips Forum, by far the most dynamic telemark and backcountry skiing discussion board on the world wide web. We have fun here, come on in and be a part of it.
MikeK

Re: Fischer E-109 vs. Asnes Ingstad

Post by MikeK » Wed Feb 17, 2016 12:36 pm

Best case scenario it looks like I can maybe test the Grey Man out next Tuesday or Wednesday.

I should have them in before the weekend and I'll take measurements. This weekend doesn't look ideal, but it's supposed to get below freezing again by Tuesday. Hopefully we retain a base and get some fresh snow over top. If so I'll send the Grey Man out on a night mission.

User avatar
Cannatonic
Posts: 983
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2014 9:07 pm

Re: Fischer E-109 vs. Asnes Ingstad

Post by Cannatonic » Thu Feb 18, 2016 1:35 pm

the eagle has landed - actually a husky! the Breidablikk definitely have more camber than the Sbound 78. Also very soft/bend-able tips.

I made an interesting discovery - the balance point on both these is virtually the same as chord center. The balance point on the Gamme 210's is at least 1cm forward of the BP on my 210 E99's. So I will mount my super tele's on BP for both Asnes skis. On my E99's I mounted 1cm forward of BP, so the bindings will be in the same place on both skis. I think I like being at chord center on this type of ski……..

the BP appears to be 1" forward of the "G" in "Noreg" on both skis btw……could be useful:
IMG_0631.JPG
"All wisdom is to be gained through suffering"
-Will Lange (quoting Inuit chieftan)



MikeK

Re: Fischer E-109 vs. Asnes Ingstad

Post by MikeK » Thu Feb 18, 2016 2:03 pm

Ahhhhhh... you dog!

You were holding out. Now way you ordered those after I ordered mine!

Mine should be in today... I hope.

Cool thing about the BP/Chord. I was going to measure mine and decide which I wanted to do. Looks like I'll have no trouble deciding ;)



User avatar
lilcliffy
Posts: 4285
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2015 6:20 pm
Location: Stanley, New Brunswick, Canada
Ski style: backcountry Nordic ski touring
Favorite Skis: Asnes Ingstad, Combat Nato, Amundsen, Rabb 68; Altai Kom
Favorite boots: Alpina Alaska BC; Lundhags Expedition; Alfa Skaget XP; Scarpa T4
Occupation: Forestry Professional
Instructor at Maritime College of Forest Technology
Husband, father, farmer and logger

Re: Fischer E-109 vs. Asnes Ingstad

Post by lilcliffy » Thu Feb 18, 2016 2:38 pm

Isn't the Breidablikk the same ski as the Ingstad- without the metal edges?
Last edited by lilcliffy on Thu Feb 18, 2016 10:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Cross-country AND down-hill skiing in the backcountry.
Unashamed to be a "cross-country type" and love skiing down-hill.



User avatar
Woodserson
Posts: 2996
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2015 10:25 am
Location: New Hampshire
Ski style: Bumps, trees, steeps and long woodsy XC tours
Occupation: Confused Turn Farmer

Re: Fischer E-109 vs. Asnes Ingstad

Post by Woodserson » Thu Feb 18, 2016 2:40 pm

So awesome, dude! Nice haul.



MikeK

Re: Fischer E-109 vs. Asnes Ingstad

Post by MikeK » Thu Feb 18, 2016 2:41 pm

Yup, it's the same ski supposedly.



User avatar
bgregoire
Posts: 1511
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2014 9:31 am
Ski style: Nordic backcountry touring with lots of turns
Favorite Skis: Fisher E99 & Boundless (98), Åsnes Ingstad, K2 Wayback 88
Favorite boots: Crispi Sydpolen, Alico Teletour & Alfa Polar

Re: Fischer E-109 vs. Asnes Ingstad

Post by bgregoire » Thu Feb 18, 2016 3:07 pm

MikeK wrote:Yup, it's the same ski supposedly.
Should have softer camber, be softer at the tip and less grabby at the edges (of course) given its metal free. God bless the hounds. I want to see pics of you Ski-joring Canna!
I live for the Telemark arc....The feeeeeeel.....I ski miles to get to a place where there is guaranteed snow to do the deal....TM



MikeK

Re: Fischer E-109 vs. Asnes Ingstad

Post by MikeK » Thu Feb 18, 2016 3:12 pm

If you send it to me I'll measure it :mrgreen:

I'm going to measure the 200cm Ingstads and overlay it with the Eon and S78 so we can have some point of reference.

My measurement is crude, but if you have 30lbs in lead weights in 5 lb increments you could repeat it. It's not enough weight for stiff DC skis and I realize I should actually measure wax pocket length vs load rather than camber gap. it should give more repeatable, meaningful, and easier to measure results, but I'll do the camber gap first.

I did a lot of looking on the net and they measure race skis that way, both vertical deflection and wax pocket length. Both are useful measurements to understand how the ski flexes. Beyond that, for DH, it's helpful to see how the ski reverse cambers.



User avatar
Cannatonic
Posts: 983
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2014 9:07 pm

Re: Fischer E-109 vs. Asnes Ingstad

Post by Cannatonic » Thu Feb 18, 2016 3:49 pm

update - I just talked to Neptune - they have more skis than appear on the website. Nansen is sold out, but they have NATO combat in 190cm and 210cm for $299 - didn't someone here want 210's?? She said a few other models are in stock that aren't on the website, not sure which ones. Forgot to ask about Ingstad. You call 303-499-1027 and ask for Stephanie.
"All wisdom is to be gained through suffering"
-Will Lange (quoting Inuit chieftan)



User avatar
athabascae
Posts: 234
Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2015 9:17 pm
Location: Whitehorse, Yukon
Favorite Skis: Asnes MR48; Asnes Ingstad
Favorite boots: Alpina Traverse BC; Alpina Alaska BC

Re: Fischer E-109 vs. Asnes Ingstad

Post by athabascae » Thu Feb 18, 2016 3:57 pm

Nice skis Canna!!! What size did you get?

I just had NNN-BC magnums put on my Ingstads yesterday. Assuming I keep the Alaskas I got a day or two ago, I'm posed to get them out this weekend for the first spin....

That husky top sheet is awesome. Ski-joring is a howl.

Tom



Post Reply