I agree with Fish. 189 is too short for that ski and your weight for effecient touring. 199 is a better size and imo wont be any more challenging to turn than the 189.fisheater wrote: ↑Fri Apr 16, 2021 10:51 am@borchjd i weigh 190, if I were to purchase the E-88 the only size I would get is 199. That ski isn’t a real turning ski, like an S-98. I cannot think of a worse combo than being on a Fischer waxless, which have good grip, and being heavy so that the scales constantly drag.
That’s just my opinion. I’m not a big waxless guy. I need to be up front about that. I have an S-112, so I know Fischer scales. Over 200 lbs, you’re not on the line, I don’t care what Fischer puts in their recommendations.
XCd recommendations: MN
Re: XCd recommendations: MN
Re: XCd recommendations: MN
Great feedback. 199 it is! I'll keep my eyes peeled for when they're back in stock. Thanks all!