asnes Ingstad waxless vs BC/waxable
- Stephen
- Posts: 1487
- Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2020 12:49 am
- Location: PNW USA
- Ski style: Aspirational
- Favorite Skis: Armada Tracer 118 (195), Gamme (210), Ingstad (205), Objective BC (178)
- Favorite boots: Alfa Guard Advance, Scarpa TX Pro
- Occupation: Beyond
6’3” / 191cm — 172# / 78kg, size 47 / 30 mondo
Re: asnes Ingstad waxless vs BC/waxable
Post removed.
No man, you want sex nuts on the back-side!
https://www.google.com/search?biw=1115& ... CAs&uact=5
No man, you want sex nuts on the back-side!
https://www.google.com/search?biw=1115& ... CAs&uact=5
Last edited by Stephen on Sat Nov 21, 2020 1:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: asnes Ingstad waxless vs BC/waxable
Oh, definitely hear you on the look underneath. G3 riser looks way (1.3mm) beefier around the hole than the Voile.Woodserson wrote: ↑Fri Nov 20, 2020 8:11 pmIt depends on the riser and what's underneath. They are not necessarily a plastic box, but weight-optimized and hollow underneath with plastic stringers underneath, there may not be enough material to drive in an insert.jalp wrote: ↑Fri Nov 20, 2020 5:58 pmHas anyone here set plastic risers up with something like Binding Freedom inserts? That would, in theory at least, allow for unlimited binding changes. I've set inserts in skis but not in riser tops and I don't see why it wouldn't work there as well.Woodserson wrote: ↑Fri Nov 20, 2020 4:57 pm
if it's a plastic riser. you only get so many times you can screw into it. remember to turn the screw backwards until you here and feel it "click" of it dropping in place and then screw in normally, this way the threads will follow the old pathways, do less damage, and not pull out as easy. Voile told me they are comfortably with 3 binding changes on their plastic riser. Your comfort level may be different, of course. Just something to keep in mind.
But I really like where you're going with this.
Caveat emptor folks, just throwing some ideas around.
@fisheater Good call, would need just a slight counterbore on the riser bottom to clear the head and some epoxy to prevent the dreaded spin. Easy job!
@Stephen Dude, it sounds dirty when you say it that way.
Apologies for going so far off topic.
- lowangle al
- Posts: 2755
- Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2014 3:36 pm
- Location: Pocono Mts / Chugach Mts
- Ski style: BC with focus on downhill perfection
- Favorite Skis: powder skis
- Favorite boots: Scarpa T4
- Occupation: Retired cement mason. Current job is to take my recreation as serious as I did my past employment.
Re: asnes Ingstad waxless vs BC/waxable
I have done numerous binding changes on Voile risers and being careful like Woods suggests I never noticed any degrading of the risers.Woodserson wrote: ↑Fri Nov 20, 2020 4:57 pmif it's a plastic riser. you only get so many times you can screw into it. remember to turn the screw backwards until you here and feel it "click" of it dropping in place and then screw in normally, this way the threads will follow the old pathways, do less damage, and not pull out as easy. Voile told me they are comfortably with 3 binding changes on their plastic riser. Your comfort level may be different, of course. Just something to keep in mind.Roelant wrote: ↑Fri Nov 20, 2020 3:02 pm
The 10mm riser plates are there because I like the climbing wires, and also because it would allow me to switch around the main bindings, Rottefella ST Hardwire cable, with the Voile 3 pin cables on my Nansens on the fly, if I find one or the other more suited to XC as opposed to more vertical tours.
- lowangle al
- Posts: 2755
- Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2014 3:36 pm
- Location: Pocono Mts / Chugach Mts
- Ski style: BC with focus on downhill perfection
- Favorite Skis: powder skis
- Favorite boots: Scarpa T4
- Occupation: Retired cement mason. Current job is to take my recreation as serious as I did my past employment.
Re: asnes Ingstad waxless vs BC/waxable
Pertaining wax vs waxless. I never skied any Asnes skis, but in general I would rather ski a well waxed single camber ski than any double camber scaled ski that I've ever tried, for k&g performance.
Anyone ever compare a waxed Ft to a scaled Ingstad?
Anyone ever compare a waxed Ft to a scaled Ingstad?
- Woodserson
- Posts: 2995
- Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2015 10:25 am
- Location: New Hampshire
- Ski style: Bumps, trees, steeps and long woodsy XC tours
- Occupation: Confused Turn Farmer
Re: asnes Ingstad waxless vs BC/waxable
Not on the same day... I will file this away for future experiment.lowangle al wrote: ↑Sat Nov 21, 2020 6:59 amPertaining wax vs waxless. I never skied any Asnes skis, but in general I would rather ski a well waxed single camber ski than any double camber scaled ski that I've ever tried, for k&g performance.
Anyone ever compare a waxed Ft to a scaled Ingstad?
Al, I think you would probably shine on the 196 FT62.
- lilcliffy
- Posts: 4157
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2015 6:20 pm
- Location: Stanley, New Brunswick, Canada
- Ski style: backcountry Nordic ski touring
- Favorite Skis: Asnes Ingstad, Combat Nato, Amundsen, Rabb 68; Altai Kom
- Favorite boots: Alpina Alaska BC; Lundhags Expedition; Alfa Skaget XP; Scarpa T4
- Occupation: Forestry Professional
Instructor at Maritime College of Forest Technology
Husband, father, farmer and logger
Re: asnes Ingstad waxless vs BC/waxable
Do we know anything about the material quality of the WL Ingstad? Extruded base?
Cross-country AND down-hill skiing in the backcountry.
Unashamed to be a "cross-country type" and love skiing down-hill.
Unashamed to be a "cross-country type" and love skiing down-hill.
- lowangle al
- Posts: 2755
- Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2014 3:36 pm
- Location: Pocono Mts / Chugach Mts
- Ski style: BC with focus on downhill perfection
- Favorite Skis: powder skis
- Favorite boots: Scarpa T4
- Occupation: Retired cement mason. Current job is to take my recreation as serious as I did my past employment.
Re: asnes Ingstad waxless vs BC/waxable
I do need a ski like that in my quiver to replace my 30 year old Atomic Tour Cap Lites.Woodserson wrote: ↑Sat Nov 21, 2020 8:11 amNot on the same day... I will file this away for future experiment.lowangle al wrote: ↑Sat Nov 21, 2020 6:59 amPertaining wax vs waxless. I never skied any Asnes skis, but in general I would rather ski a well waxed single camber ski than any double camber scaled ski that I've ever tried, for k&g performance.
Anyone ever compare a waxed Ft to a scaled Ingstad?
Al, I think you would probably shine on the 196 FT62.
How are Asnes scales compared to voiles, as far as grip, noise and drag?
- Woodserson
- Posts: 2995
- Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2015 10:25 am
- Location: New Hampshire
- Ski style: Bumps, trees, steeps and long woodsy XC tours
- Occupation: Confused Turn Farmer
Re: asnes Ingstad waxless vs BC/waxable
We're still trying to figure that out. But all experience so far indicates to: glide is the priority, bigly. Grip is poor on inclines.lowangle al wrote: ↑Sun Nov 22, 2020 6:16 am
I do need a ski like that in my quiver to replace my 30 year old Atomic Tour Cap Lites.
How are Asnes scales compared to voiles, as far as grip, noise and drag?