Short, waxable ski recommendation
- randoskier
- Posts: 1078
- Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2016 2:08 am
- Location: Yank in Italy
- Ski style: awkward
- Favorite Skis: snow skis
- Favorite boots: go-go
- Occupation: International Pop Sensation
- Capercaillie
- Posts: 222
- Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2022 1:35 pm
- Location: western Canada
- Ski style: trying not to fall too much
- Favorite Skis: Alpina 1500T, Kazama Telemark Comp
- Favorite boots: Alfa Horizon, Crispi Nordland, Scarpa T4
Re: Short, waxable ski recommendation
If you look at what online retailers are stocking this season, it seems like Åsnes has decided to go all-in on trying to push the waxless crap. This will probably be the end of the brand. As @randoskier mentioned, their product in this market is vastly overpriced and underperforming. I don't understand who decided it would be a good idea to change almost their entire product line to an over-crowded market segment where they have no competitive advantage.
A few comments on their marketing BS:
"Waxless skis have come a long way. The position, design, functionality, and length of the patterns have all been adapted and developed for the benefit of increased efficiency and effectiveness, both in grip and glide. That is to say that the new generation of waxless skis are vastly different skis from older skis... In short, waxless bases have become a truly valid option."
If you read any books or magazine articles from the mid-1970s onwards, literally this same BS is repeated over and over again every single season.
"The combination of waxless soles and skins is extremely versatile, simple, and reliable."
The Åsnes kicker skin attachment is very reliable... at peeling the kicker skin off of the ski. IMO it is a seriously flawed design.
A few comments on their marketing BS:
"Waxless skis have come a long way. The position, design, functionality, and length of the patterns have all been adapted and developed for the benefit of increased efficiency and effectiveness, both in grip and glide. That is to say that the new generation of waxless skis are vastly different skis from older skis... In short, waxless bases have become a truly valid option."
If you read any books or magazine articles from the mid-1970s onwards, literally this same BS is repeated over and over again every single season.
"The combination of waxless soles and skins is extremely versatile, simple, and reliable."
The Åsnes kicker skin attachment is very reliable... at peeling the kicker skin off of the ski. IMO it is a seriously flawed design.
- corlay
- Posts: 151
- Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2021 6:13 pm
- Location: central NY
- Ski style: Woodland XC-BC tours
- Favorite Skis: Asnes Gamme 54, Fischer Transnordic 66, Fischer Traverse 78; Madshus Birke Beiner, Peltonen METSA
- Favorite boots: Crispi Norland Hook BC, Fischer BC Grand Tour
Re: Short, waxable ski recommendation
scales have their place.
and, as mentioned, Fischer's are about the best out there at the moment.
I like scales for either:
a) warm conditions (>30f) I don't like to mess with soft waxes/Klisters
-or-
b) variable conditions, anticipated large temp swings across the tour and/or varying show conditions (fluff, hard-pak, slush, ice, etc)
but nothing beats a pair of waxed bases in the right conditions.
(and when you've nailed the wax/temp choice!)
and, as mentioned, Fischer's are about the best out there at the moment.
I like scales for either:
a) warm conditions (>30f) I don't like to mess with soft waxes/Klisters
-or-
b) variable conditions, anticipated large temp swings across the tour and/or varying show conditions (fluff, hard-pak, slush, ice, etc)
but nothing beats a pair of waxed bases in the right conditions.
(and when you've nailed the wax/temp choice!)
Last edited by corlay on Mon Nov 25, 2024 5:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Short, waxable ski recommendation
The problem with waxable skis is the same skis can work well in many different conditions if the wax is right. I mean, that is a problem if you sell skis. When the skiing is not so good you think you had better wax differently next time, instead of you had better buy some different skis.
-
- Posts: 1014
- Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2022 5:24 pm
- Location: Da UP eh
- Ski style: Over the river and through the woods
- Favorite Skis: Nansen, Finnmark, Kongsvold, Combat NATO, Fischer Superlite, RCS
- Favorite boots: Crispi Bre, Hook, Alpina 1600, Alico Ski March, Crispi Mountain
Re: Short, waxable ski recommendation
I have never had this happen. Has it been common for you? Granted, I haven't used their skins except for steep climbs and very, very rarely when not wanting to wax for grip, so my dataset is minimal. Also, their NATO ski has a recessed area for the skin attachment point which I would think makes it even less likely to disengage. The rest of your analaysis is dead-on--they occupy a niche for metal edged backcountry waxable skis, dominate this market even with their higher pricepoint, and are instead focusing on something which others (Fischer) do better.Capercaillie wrote: ↑Mon Nov 25, 2024 11:48 amThe Åsnes kicker skin attachment is very reliable... at peeling the kicker skin off of the ski. IMO it is a seriously flawed design.
- pacificnomad
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2024 4:06 pm
- Location: Western US
- Ski style: XCd
- Favorite Skis: Fischer Transnordic 66 waxable, Asnes Knogsvold
- Favorite boots: Alfa Gaurd
- Occupation: Catlady
Re: Short, waxable ski recommendation
What are your thoughts on Asnes new Nato specific skin? Looks pretty durable and like it'll stay in place better maybe. They're 100% nylon though, so more like snow shuffling rather than a nice mohair glide.Capercaillie wrote: ↑Mon Nov 25, 2024 11:48 amIf you look at what online retailers are stocking this season, it seems like Åsnes has decided to go all-in on trying to push the waxless crap. This will probably be the end of the brand. As @randoskier mentioned, their product in this market is vastly overpriced and underperforming. I don't understand who decided it would be a good idea to change almost their entire product line to an over-crowded market segment where they have no competitive advantage.
A few comments on their marketing BS:
"Waxless skis have come a long way. The position, design, functionality, and length of the patterns have all been adapted and developed for the benefit of increased efficiency and effectiveness, both in grip and glide. That is to say that the new generation of waxless skis are vastly different skis from older skis... In short, waxless bases have become a truly valid option."
If you read any books or magazine articles from the mid-1970s onwards, literally this same BS is repeated over and over again every single season.
"The combination of waxless soles and skins is extremely versatile, simple, and reliable."
The Åsnes kicker skin attachment is very reliable... at peeling the kicker skin off of the ski. IMO it is a seriously flawed design.