ᚠᚨᚱ ᚾᛟᚱᚦ ᛊᚲᛁᛖᚱ wrote: ↑Mon Jan 11, 2021 12:48 amI kind of independently connected the idea that the tele technique could be applied to xcountry skis. That got me into searching for xc equipment that was more rugged than soft shoes and track skis.
Reading about others' discovery of this middle ground of skiing is fascinating, and mimics my own entry into it...
I've been aware of "backcountry nordic" for many years, specifically due to the free, photocopied info packets available at Neptune Mountaineering that described this type of skiing and its historical roots. Back then, though, I was more eager to learn the telemark turn, and was easily convinced that I needed plastic boots, so I went that route. Even the "Telemark Tips" book--a book I really love and have benefited from--kinda ignores the potential for a middle ground (see photo). The authors present skinny "telemark" skis as antiquated, inadequate, and relics of a bygone era...
My experience cross country skiing never made me think that it would be possible to turn the dang things--quite the opposite.
This winter I simply wanted a bit more control while cross country skiing, and I scored a quality pair of metal-edged skis on craigslist. It didn't take long to recognize that "hey, maybe I can telemark on gentle terrain..." ...Then I found this forum....which led me to Steve Barnett's book...and holy cow, yes, you CAN turn them!!!
I have to think that other people, like me, will begin to realize--or revisit--the benefits of having:
1) a lightweight set up,
2) a relatively affordable set up
3) relatively safe terrain that is made more engaging on x-country skis
That said, I can also easily imagine the opposite--expensive AT gear dominating, etc.
For now, I'm just so happy that I finally figured out what works for me. I call it "simple skiing." TRIM THE FAT!!!